ArticleCommunications biology2025
Object fine-grained discrimination as a sensitive cognitive marker of transentorhinal integrity.
Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Distinct theta and alpha electrophysiological dynamics during audiovisual semantic processing in healthy aging and mild cognitive impairment.Aging brain · 2026Article
- Object fine-grained discrimination as a sensitive cognitive marker of transentorhinal integrity.Communications biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The transentorhinal cortex (tErC) is one of the first regions affected by Alzheimer's disease (AD), often showing changes before clinical symptoms appear. Understanding its role in cognition is key to detecting early cognitive impairments in AD. This study tested the hypothesis that the tErC supports fine-grained representations of unique individual objects, sensitively to the granularity of the demanded discrimination, influencing both perceptual and mnemonic functions. We examined the tErC's role in object versus scene discrimination, using objective (based on a pretrained convolutional neural network, CNN) and subjective (human-rated) measures of visual similarity. Our results show that the structural integrity of the tErC is specifically related to the sensitivity to visual similarity for objects, but not for scenes. Importantly, this relationship depends on how visual similarity is measured: it appears only when using CNN visual similarity measures in perceptual discrimination, and solely when using subjective similarity ratings in mnemonic discrimination. Furthermore, in mnemonic discrimination, object sensitivity to visual similarity was specifically associated with the integrity of tErC-BA36 connectivity, only when similarity was computed from subjective ratings. Altogether, these findings suggest that discrimination sensitivity to object visual similarity may represent a specific marker of tErC integrity after accounting for the type of similarity measured.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.