ArticleScientific reports2025
Multimodal and longitudinal characterization of distinct tau and atrophy clusters in Alzheimer's disease spectrum.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Atypical Alzheimer disease: a multi-axis framework toward defining heterogeneity.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2026Review
- Mapping heterogeneous brain structural subtypes in alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment using normative models.Translational psychiatry · 2026Article
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarker Clustering Defines Biological Subtypes of Alzheimer's Disease.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Research progress in neuroimaging of sporadic early-onset Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuropathological and neuroimaging studies have identified several (endo-)phenotypes of Alzheimer's disease (AD), suggesting a substantial heterogeneity in cerebral atrophy and tau spreading patterns. We included in our study a total of 320 participants, including healthy controls (N = 154) and patients across the AD spectrum (N = 166). We identified clusters of cerebral atrophy and tau PET uptake using a data-driven and similarity-based clustering approach, aiming to examine regional abnormality patterns in both modalities and differences in the clinical, cognitive, and biomarker characteristics among derived clusters. Abnormality patterns in tau PET and T1-weighted MRI within the same individuals revealed four distinct clusters for each imaging modality as surrogate markers of tau and neurodegeneration, respectively. The tau PET and atrophy clusters mainly showed substantial differences in their clustering allocations. While having the most severe biomarkers burden, the left temporal tau and diffuse atrophy clusters revealed the fastest clinical progression and steepest increase in tau PET uptake. Moreover, the diffuse atrophy cluster showed the fastest cortical volume loss, followed by the limbic-predominant atrophy cluster. Our results suggest characteristic differences between tau PET and atrophy clusters, especially for tau PET clusters, revealing more pronounced differences in cognitive profiles and disease biomarker trajectories than atrophy clusters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.