ArticleScientific reports2025
CMRI-detected brain injuries and clinical key risk factors associated with adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in very preterm infants.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Neonatal Brain: Modalities, Scoring Systems, and Clinical Applications.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Anxiety Symptoms in Preschool Children Born Very Preterm: Associations with Cognition and Neonatal Striatal Volumes.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Analysis of risk factors and establishment of a predictive model for brain injury in neonates with surgical necrotizing enterocolitis: a retrospective study.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Influence of oropharyngeal therapy with mother's own milk on the microbiome and metabolome of very preterm infants: a pilot study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neurological impairment is high after preterm birth. This study evaluates the impact and interplay of cMRI-detected brain injuries (BI) and clinical risk factors on neurodevelopmental outcomes and extracts the most important key factors. A retrospective analysis was conducted on risk factors (perinatal/neonatal, cMRI-detected BI) for adverse motor (MO) and cognitive (CO) outcomes (Bayley Scales of Infant Development, 24 months corrected age) in a tertiary center cohort (2009-2018) of very preterm infants (< 32 weeks of gestation) using uni-/multivariable regression models. We included 342 infants (mean gestational age:28.0 ± 2.3 weeks; male:49%). Significant clinical predictors for MO/CO included GA, birthweight, APGAR score, catecholamine treatment, ventilation, retinopathy of prematurity, transfusion of red blood cells (RBCs), bronchopulmonary dysplasia, surgery, and patent ductus arteriosus interventions (all p < 0.01/p < 0.01), surfactant (MO: p = 0.037), and sepsis (p < 0.001/p = 0.016). (Severe) cMRI-detected BIs (> 1, all p < 0.05) and not only severe intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) III°/III°+PVHI and ventricular dilatation (VD) (all p < 0.05), but also mild/moderate injuries like IVH II° (p < 0.001/p < 0.024), cerebellar hemorrhage (CO: p = 0.028), and moderate VD (MO: p = 0.005) significantly impacted outcomes. Independent key factors were > 1 severe cMRI-detected BI (MO/CO:-11.27/-10.3 score points (sp), p = 0.021/0.043), APGAR score (10 min, MO/CO:+5.3/+4.45 sp/point, p < 0.001/p < 0.001), surfactant administration (MO:+4.88 sp, p = 0.031), and transfusion of RBCs (MO/CO:-1.69/-1.96 sp/transfusion, p = 0.006/p < 0.001). In conclusion, combining imaging and clinical (key) risk factors is important for risk stratification of preterm infants. Even mild BI, like IVH II°, significantly contributes to adverse outcomes, underlining the importance of cMRI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.