ArticleScientific reports2025
Differentiability of voice disorders through explainable AI.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Voice Disorders: Current Landscape, Emerging Applications and Future Directions.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The voice can be affected by various types of pathology. The phoniatric medical examination is the acoustic analysis, which evaluates the characteristic parameters extracted from the vocal signal. Computer-assisted decision-making systems can help specialists to detect vocal pathologies using only the patient's voice. In this study, transfer learning techniques are used to perform the acoustic analysis. Fine-tuned OpenL3 then predicts whether or not the signals contain a pathology by classifying them under 8 different pathologies. A publicly available dataset is used with the categories Hyperkinetic dysphonia, Hypokinetic dysphonia, reflux laryngitis vocal fold nodules, prolapse, glottic insufficiency and vocal fold paralysis in addition to the Healthy class. The results obtained are very convincing. The accuracy with OpenL3, using tranfer learning, was 99.44%. In addition, explainable decision support systems (XDSS) provide an in-depth understanding of the decision-making process. Obtaining an image resulting from the averaging of all the Occlusion Sensitivity maps will enable us to understand the spatio-temporal characteristics of the disordered voices used for classification. Thanks to explainability methods, a new term, the differentiability, can be discussed to explain the black-box operation of deep networks. For purposes of rapid diagnosis and prevention, this work could provide more detail on disordered voices by enabling a promising explainable diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.