ArticleScientific reports2025
Prediction of reproductive and developmental toxicity using an attention and gate augmented graph convolutional network.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Secondary Pharmacology Targets for Pediatric Developmental Safety Assessment of New Drugs: Clinical Pharmacology Considerations.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Review
- Attention-Guided Multi-View Contrastive Learning for Predicting Sparse Drug-Gene Associations.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2026Article
- Enhancing Drug Response Prediction in Epilepsy with Emerging Multimodal Models: Focus on Clinical, Pharmacologic, and Genomic Factors.CNS drugs · 2026Review
- Article
- Development of machine learning-based multi-task quantitative structure-activity relationship models for predicting toxicities in six human organ systems.Computational toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Article
- AI snake oil? A risk/benefit analysis for toxicology.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of OECD guideline data and Tox21 assays to improve reproductive and developmental toxicity prediction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Due to the diverse molecular structures of chemical compounds and their intricate biological pathways of toxicity, predicting their reproductive and developmental toxicity remains a challenge. Traditional Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship models that rely on molecular descriptors have limitations in capturing the complexity of reproductive and developmental toxicity to achieve high predictive performance. In this study, we developed a descriptor-free deep learning model by constructing a Graph Convolutional Network designed with multi-head attention and gated skip-connections to predict reproductive and developmental toxicity. By integrating structural alerts directly related to toxicity into the model, we enabled more effective learning of toxicologically relevant substructures. We built a dataset of 4,514 diverse compounds, including both organic and inorganic substances. The model was trained and validated using stratified 5-fold cross-validation. It demonstrated excellent predictive performance, achieving an accuracy of 81.19% on the test set. To address the interpretability of the deep learning model, we identified subgraphs corresponding to known structural alerts, providing insights into the model's decision-making process. This study was conducted in accordance with the OECD principles for reliable Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship modeling and contributes to the development of robust in silico models for toxicity prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.