ReviewNeurosurgical review2025
A critical appraisal of clinical guidelines on radiotherapy treatments for spinal metastasis.
Review in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and Safety of Electroacupuncture for Postoperative Insomnia in Patients With Spinal Metastasis: Protocol of a Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Development of Core Outcome Set for Integrative Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Clinical Research in Spinal Metastases (COS-TCM-SM).Chinese journal of integrative medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This review systematically reviewed the current guidelines related to radiotherapy for spinal metastases, summarized the relevant recommendations, and assessed the quality of their supporting evidence. The guidelines on radiotherapy for spinal metastases were searched by the keyword "guidelines" and "spinal metastasis". The most updated guidelines on radiotherapy for spinal metastasis were selected based on pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. AGREE II was used to evaluate the quality of these guidelines. In addition, the related recommendations were extracted, and their quality was assessed using an evidence-grading scale. Nine guidelines established between 2013 and 2024 were included in this study. Three of the guidelines had an applicability rating of less than 50%. The difference in scores was the largest in rigor of development (range 48.50-88.03%). A total of 44 recommendations based on indications, re-irradiation, radiation dose and regimen, and emergency radiotherapy, were extracted and evaluated for SM. In conclusion, this study summarizes nine guidelines on radiotherapy for SM and provides useful information for improving treatment outcomes in patients with SM. All nine guidelines scored low in terms of adaptability, and most recommendations were based on a moderate-to-high LOE. The timing of re-radiotherapy varies across guidelines and fractionated radiotherapy regimens are available for specific SM patients. SBRT is more suitable than RBRT for patients with oligo-metastases, but more high-quality evidence is needed to confirm the more advantages of SBRT compared with conventional radiotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40415053What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.