Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40415053›Full record

ReviewNeurosurgical review2025

A critical appraisal of clinical guidelines on radiotherapy treatments for spinal metastasis.

Dingbang Chen, Wenlong Yu, Mengchen Yin, Luosheng Zhang, Xin Gao, Lin Li, Quan Huang, Jianru Xiao

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dingbang ChenOrthopaedic Oncology Center, Department of Orthopedics, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Wenlong YuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Mengchen YinDepartment of Orthopaedics, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Luosheng ZhangOrthopaedic Oncology Center, Department of Orthopedics, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Xin GaoOrthopaedic Oncology Center, Department of Orthopedics, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Lin LiOrthopaedic Oncology Center, Department of Orthopedics, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Quan HuangOrthopaedic Oncology Center, Department of Orthopedics, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai, China. czhuangquan@163.com.
Jianru XiaoOrthopaedic Oncology Center, Department of Orthopedics, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai, China. czjianruxiao83@163.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82205145National Natural Science Foundation of China 82303562Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality 23YF1458200Shanghai Municipal Health Commission 20204Y0165The Project of Chinese Society of Traditional Chinese Medicine youth talent lifting 2023-QNRC2-A03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review systematically reviewed the current guidelines related to radiotherapy for spinal metastases, summarized the relevant recommendations, and assessed the quality of their supporting evidence. The guidelines on radiotherapy for spinal metastases were searched by the keyword "guidelines" and "spinal metastasis". The most updated guidelines on radiotherapy for spinal metastasis were selected based on pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. AGREE II was used to evaluate the quality of these guidelines. In addition, the related recommendations were extracted, and their quality was assessed using an evidence-grading scale. Nine guidelines established between 2013 and 2024 were included in this study. Three of the guidelines had an applicability rating of less than 50%. The difference in scores was the largest in rigor of development (range 48.50-88.03%). A total of 44 recommendations based on indications, re-irradiation, radiation dose and regimen, and emergency radiotherapy, were extracted and evaluated for SM. In conclusion, this study summarizes nine guidelines on radiotherapy for SM and provides useful information for improving treatment outcomes in patients with SM. All nine guidelines scored low in terms of adaptability, and most recommendations were based on a moderate-to-high LOE. The timing of re-radiotherapy varies across guidelines and fractionated radiotherapy regimens are available for specific SM patients. SBRT is more suitable than RBRT for patients with oligo-metastases, but more high-quality evidence is needed to confirm the more advantages of SBRT compared with conventional radiotherapy.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicSpinal NeoplasmsHumansRadiosurgeryRadiotherapyRe-IrradiationClinical guidelinesRadiotherapySpinal metastasis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.