Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40415038›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Readiness, knowledge, and attitudes of healthcare professionals in Jordan toward Monkeypox: a cross-sectional survey.

Ahmad Z Al Meslamani, Dania Abu-Naser, Rami H Al-Rifai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Community awareness and attitude in Al-Jouf region toward monkeypox.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ahmad Z Al MeslamaniCollege of Pharmacy, Al Ain University, P.O. Box 112612, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Dania Abu-NaserDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, Irbid University College, Al-Balqa Applied University, P.O.BOX, Irbid, 1293, Jordan.
Rami H Al-RifaiInfectious Diseases Epidemiology Research Advancement Unit (IDERA), Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, P.O. Box 17666, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates. rrifai@uaeu.ac.ae.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthcare professionals play a vital role in managing and containing disease outbreaks. This study evaluated the level of readiness, knowledge, and attitudes of healthcare professionals in Jordan towards Monkeypox (Mpox) disease and explored factors associated with poor level of readiness, poor level of knowledge, and negative attitude toward Mpox. A pre-validated cross-sectional survey was carried out on healthcare professionals (physicians, pharmacists and nurses) actively involved in patient care in Jordan from 15 July to 30 September 2024. After being pilot-tested on 30 healthcare professionals, the 48-item questionnaire, collected information on participant's demographics, and readiness, knowledge, and attitudes towards Mpox. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with poor readiness, poor knowledge, and negative attitude. A total of 1093 healthcare professionals participated in the survey, including 329 physicians (30.1%), 346 pharmacists (31.7%), and 418 nurses (38.2%). Among participants, 58.0% demonstrated high levels of readiness, and 53.9% showed high levels of knowledge regarding Mpox. However, one-third (33.6%) were unaware of the availability of an effective vaccine, and only 30.7% recognized the lack of an effective treatment for Mpox. Nurses had higher readiness scores (median: 5, IQR: 5) compared to physicians (median: 4, IQR: 6) and pharmacists (median: 4, IQR: 6), while physicians scored highest in knowledge (median: 8, IQR: 4), followed by nurses (median: 7, IQR: 4) and pharmacists (median: 5, IQR: 4). No prior pandemic response experience was positively associated with increased likelihood of poor Mpox readiness (AOR: 2.11, 95% CI: 1.60-2.78) and poor knowledge (AOR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.08-1.81). Poor knowledge was also linked to relying on workshops as the main information source (AOR: 2.55, 95% CI: 1.50-4.32). Negative attitudes were associated with lack of prior response experience (AOR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.04-1.77), not using digital health records (AOR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.18-2.05), and depending on colleagues for information (AOR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.00-3.00) while attending workshop was protective against having negative attitude (AOR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.17-0.60). While over half of healthcare professionals in Jordan demonstrated high readiness and knowledge regarding Mpox, significant gaps remain, particularly in vaccine and treatment awareness. Nurses showed higher readiness, whereas physicians had better knowledge levels. Targeted training and improved information dissemination strategies are needed to enhance Mpox response capacity among healthcare professionals.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelMpox, MonkeypoxAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansJordanMaleMiddle AgedPharmacistsSurveys and QuestionnairesJordanMonkeypoxMpoxOutbreakPublic health workers

Identifiers

PMID40415038
PMCPMC12104399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.