ArticleScientific reports2025
Contribution of dental treatment to reducing mortality in the ICUs: a 6-year retrospective analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oral Hygiene Interventions and Pneumonia Prevention in Critical Care: An Integrative Review of Evidence and Practice.International journal of dentistry · 2026Review
- Effects of Dental Follow-up on Oral Health, Antibiotic Prescriptions, and Hospitalizations in Pediatric Home Care Patients: A Single-Group Quasi-Experimental Study.Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community DentistryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate dental treatment outcomes and safety in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Data collected included the frequency of dental interventions, the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), patient demographics, length of ICU stay, and mortality. In the statistical analysis, logistic regression models were utilized to explore associations between dental care and patient outcomes, calculating odds ratios for mortality outcomes, with adjustments for potential confounders. More than three interventions were associated with a lower risk of mortality in both crude (p < 0.0001) and adjusted analyses (p < 0.0001), suggesting a protective effect. Patients who received more frequent dental care demonstrated improved survival outcomes. VAP did not significantly increase mortality risk in this cohort (p = 0.3511). Dental procedures were not conclusively linked to a reduction in mortality; however, they were not associated with any important adverse effects, indicating that they are safe for ICU patients. The findings indicate that regular dental treatment in the ICU may be beneficial to patient survival and does not pose additional safety risks. While VAP did not independently predict mortality, receipt of comprehensive dental care was a protective factor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.