ArticleScientific reports2025
Investigating the factors influencing users' adoption of artificial intelligence health assistants based on an extended UTAUT model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Performance and Effort Expectancy on AI-Generated Information Adoption Among Chinese Nursing Professionals: Survey-Based SEM Analysis.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Article
- The role of health literacy and attitudes toward artificial intelligence in the acceptance of telemedicine services among adults in Turkey: a cross-sectional study.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- STARA technology application and innovative behavior among Chinese employees: the roles of idea exploration support, STARA awareness, and leaders' STARA symbolization.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- A framework for longitudinal health AI agents.Nature health · 2026Article
- Unlocking AI Chatbot Potential in Healthcare: Trust-Enhanced DeLone & McLean IS Success Model.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Healthcare consumers' acceptance and use of digital health technology in LMICs and the role of self-efficacy and facilitating conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026Article
- Eye-Tracked Visual Attention to Anthropomorphic Appearance and Empathic Responses in AI Medical Conversational Agents: Dissociating Trust Gains from Attentional Synergy.Journal of eye movement research · 2026Article
- Supporting Access to Care Through Peripheral Devices and Patient-Generated Health Data: Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Determinants of the Public's Behavioral Intention to Adopt AI-Assisted Lung Cancer Screening: An Extended UTAUT Model Integrating Trust and Risk.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Acceptance of Medical History-Taking Supported by Artificial Intelligence and Chatbots: A Population-Based Survey in Germany.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Preparedness for generative AI adoption among Chinese cancer survivors: a multi-center cross-sectional survey study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Behavioral intention to use mental health chatbots in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional UTAUT-based study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- When chatbots are perceived as "understanding": a study on how virtual agent persona styles and affective interaction promote mental health acceptance.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Factors influencing medical students' adoption of AI educational agents: an extended UTAUT model.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- AI in Fracture Detection: A Cross-Disciplinary Analysis of Physician Acceptance Using the UTAUT Model.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Structural equation modeling for influencing factors on behavioral intention to adopt medical AI among Chinese nurses: a nationwide cross-sectional study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Adopting AI in medical ethics review: A configurational fsQCA study of practitioners' willingness.Digital healthArticle
- Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As an emerging healthcare technology, artificial intelligence (AI) health assistants have garnered significant attention. However, the acceptance and intention of ordinary users to adopt AI health assistants require further exploration. This study aims to identify factors influencing users' intentions to use AI health assistants and enhance understanding of the acceptance mechanisms for this technology. Based on the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT), we expanded the variables of perceived trust (PT) and perceived risk (PR). We recruited 373 Chinese ordinary users online and analyzed the data using covariance-based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM). The results indicate that the original UTAUT structure is robust, performance expectancy (PE), effort expectancy (EE), and social influence (SI) significantly positively affect behavioral intention (BI), while facilitating conditions (FC) do not show a significant impact. Additionally, perceived trust is closely related to performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and behavioral intention, negatively impacting perceived risk. Conversely, perceived risk adversely affects behavioral intention. Our findings provide valuable practical insights for developers and operators of AI health assistants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.