Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40414988›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Local response to global risk: a case study of risk perception and communication on Chinese social media regarding Fukushima's treated radioactive water discharge.

Chenxi Sun, Qingliu Ren, Yuejing Ge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chenxi SunSchool of National Safety and Emergency Management, Beijing Normal University, 19 Xinjiekou Outer Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 100875, China.
Qingliu RenFaculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, 19 Xinjiekou Outer Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 100875, China.
Yuejing GeFaculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, 19 Xinjiekou Outer Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 100875, China. geyj@bnu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines localized risk perception and communication concerning Fukushima's treated radioactive water discharge through analysis of 111,660 Weibo posts using large language model sentiment analysis and hierarchical linear modeling. Three key findings emerge: (1) Temporal dynamics dominate public engagement, with attention peaking within two weeks post-discharge before gradually declining, while fear persists as the predominant emotion despite diminishing anger responses; (2) Coastal regions demonstrate heightened participation due to geographic proximity and seafood consumption patterns, though risk perception shows no consistent spatial gradient; (3) Socioeconomic factors - particularly education levels and seafood consumption - significantly predict communication intensity, whereas economic indicators like per capita GDP show limited influence. The study proposes a three-pronged risk governance framework: temporal targeting of critical communication windows, spatially adapted messaging for coastal populations, and emotion-focused guidance to address persistent public fears. These findings illuminate how global environmental risks become localized through China's unique sociocultural filters, offering empirical support for precision policy interventions in transnational risk management.

Indexed as

CommunicationFukushima Nuclear AccidentSocial MediaChinaHumansJapanPerceptionRisk AssessmentSocioeconomic FactorsGlobal riskRisk communicationRisk perceptionSocial mediaTreated radioactive water

Identifiers

PMID40414988
PMCPMC12104379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.