ArticleScientific reports2025
The dynamics of stimulus selection in the nucleus isthmi pars magnocellularis of avian midbrain network.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Visual Stimulus-Specific Adaptation in the Avian Imc and Its Effect on Target Decoding Performance.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Mapping EEG Metrics to Human Affective and Cognitive Models: An Interdisciplinary Scoping Review from a Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The nucleus isthmi pars magnocellularis (Imc) serves as a critical node in the avian midbrain network for encoding stimulus salience and selection. While reciprocal inhibitory projections among Imc neurons (inhibitory loop) are known to govern stimulus selection, existing studies have predominantly focused on stimulus selection under stimuli of constant relative intensity. However, animals typically encounter complex and changeable visual scenes. Thus, how Imc neurons represent stimulus selection under varying relative stimulus intensities remains unclear. Here, we examined the dynamics of stimulus selection by in vivo recording of Imc neurons' responses to spatiotemporally successive visual stimuli divided into two segments: the previous stimulus and the post stimulus. Our data demonstrate that Imc neurons can encode sensory memory of the previous stimulus, which modulates competition and salience representation in the post stimulus. This history-dependent modulation is also manifested in persistent neural activity after stimulus cessation. We identified, through neural tracing, focal inactivation, and computational modeling experiments, projections from the nucleus isthmi pars parvocellularis (Ipc) to "shepherd's crook" (Shc) neurons, which could be either direct or indirect. These projections enhance Imc neurons' responses and persistent neural activity after stimulus cessation. This connectivity supports a Shc-Ipc-Shc excitatory loop in the midbrain network. The coexistence of excitatory and inhibitory loops provides a neural substrate for continuous attractor network models, a proposed framework for neural information representation. This study also offers a potential explanation for how animals maintain short-term attention to targets in complex and changeable environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.