Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40414953›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A novel feature fusion and mountain gazelle optimizer based framework for the recognition of jute pests in sustainable agriculture.

Soner Kiziloluk, Mucahit Karaduman, Serpil Aslan, Muhammed Yildirim, Muhammad Attique Khan, Fatimah Alhayan, Yunyoung Nam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Soner KizilolukDepartment of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Malatya Turgut Ozal University, Malatya, Turkey.
Mucahit KaradumanDepartment of Software Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Malatya Turgut Ozal University, Malatya, Turkey.
Serpil AslanDepartment of Software Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Malatya Turgut Ozal University, Malatya, Turkey.
Muhammed YildirimDepartment of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Malatya Turgut Ozal University, Malatya, Turkey.
Muhammad Attique KhanDepartment of AI, College of Computer Engineering and Science, Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University, Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia. attique.khan@ieee.org.
Fatimah AlhayanDepartment of Information Systems, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, P.O.Box 84428, 11671, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Yunyoung NamEmotional and Intelligent Child Care Convergence Research Center, Soonchunhyang University, Asan, 31538, Korea. ynam@sch.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sustainable agriculture is an approach that involves adopting and developing agricultural practices to increase efficiency and preserve resources, both environmentally and economically. Jute is one of the primary sources of income grown in many countries. At this stage, increasing efficiency in jute production and protecting it from pests is essential. Detecting jute pests at an early stage will not only improve crop yield but also provide more income. In this paper, an artificial intelligence-based model was suggested to detect jute pests at an early stage. In this developed model, two different pre-trained models were used for feature extraction. To improve the performance of the developed model, the features obtained using the DarkNet-53 and DenseNet-201 models were combined. After this stage, the metaheuristic Mountain Gazelle Optimizer (MGO) was used, allowing the developed model to work faster and achieve more successful results. Feature selection was carried out using MGO; thus, more successful results were obtained with fewer, more compelling features. The proposed model was compared with six different models and five different classifiers accepted in the literature. In the developed model, 17 different jute pests were detected with 96.779% accuracy. The accuracy value achieved in the developed model is promising in successfully detecting jute pests.

Indexed as

AgricultureAlgorithmsAnimalsArtificial IntelligenceCrops, AgriculturalClassificationDeep learningJuteMountain gazelle optimizerOptimization

Identifiers

PMID40414953
PMCPMC12104410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.