ArticleScientific reports2025
Damage analysis of split spherical node concrete filled steel tube lattice wind turbine plane towers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study analyzes the split spherical node concrete-filled steel tube wind turbine plane towers with web member wall thicknesses of 3 mm (TJ-1) and 5 mm (TJ-2) through low-cyclic reversed load tests, comparing their hysteresis curves, skeleton curves, ductility, and stiffness degradation. The analysis is further validated using ABAQUS software simulations, exploring the impact of web member diameter ratios on the damage of the plane towers. The results indicate that the failure modes of the split spherical node concrete-filled steel tube wind turbine plane towers include weld tearing failure, web member buckling failure, and high-strength bolt pull-out failure. The yield load and peak load of specimen TJ-2 are 9% and 21% higher than those of specimen TJ-1, respectively, with a more plump hysteresis curve and better energy dissipation capacity. Increasing the web member wall thickness can enhance the initial and overall stiffness of the tower. The parametric analysis of the web member diameter ratio suggests that a ratio of 0.11-0.13 is recommended for engineering applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.