Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40414890›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Steps toward clinical validation of exhaled volatile organic compound biomarkers for hypoglycemia in persons with type 1 diabetes.

Mark Woollam, Paula Angarita-Rivera, Sanskar Thakur, Ali Daneshkhah, Amanda P Siegel, Dana S Hardin, Mangilal Agarwal

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07696273 (Miniaturized Smart Sensor Device for the Detection of Hypo- and Hyperglycemic Events in Persons Diagnosed With Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07696273 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Miniaturized Smart Sensor Device for the Detection of Hypo- and Hyperglycemic Events in Persons Diagnosed With Diabetes

TypeinterventionalSponsorIndiana UniversityRan2026 to 2027Enrolled40ConditionsDiabetes, Hyperglycemia, Hypoglycemia (Diabetic)ArmsSensing Device and Tedlar Bags
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mark WoollamIntegrated Nanosystems Development Institute, Indiana University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, 46202, USA.
Paula Angarita-RiveraIntegrated Nanosystems Development Institute, Indiana University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, 46202, USA.
Sanskar ThakurIntegrated Nanosystems Development Institute, Indiana University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, 46202, USA.
Ali DaneshkhahIntegrated Nanosystems Development Institute, Indiana University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, 46202, USA.
Amanda P SiegelDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Indiana University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, 46202, USA.
Dana S HardinOhioHealth Physician Group, Columbus, 43214, USA.
Mangilal AgarwalIntegrated Nanosystems Development Institute, Indiana University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, 46202, USA. agarwal@iu.edu.

Funding

National Science Foundation 1502310
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Persons with type 1 diabetes (T1D) must track/control their blood glucose (BG) levels to avoid hypoglycemic events (BG < 70 mg/dL), which in the most severe cases can lead to seizures or even death. Canines may lead the way toward innovative testing solutions, as they can be trained to identify hypoglycemia simply and noninvasively by smelling exhaled volatile organic compounds (VOCs). To identify breath-based biomarkers of hypoglycemia, samples were collected during two consecutive summers at a diabetes camp (Cohort 1 and Cohort 2), and VOCs were analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Conserved VOCs between the two cohorts were identified, but individual VOCs alone had low accuracies for detection. Therefore, supervised multivariate statistical analysis was undertaken to identify a biosignature in the training data set (Cohort 1) that could detect hypoglycemia with higher accuracy (sensitivity = 94.8%/specificity = 95.0%). When this model was blindly tested on Cohort 2, hypoglycemia was classified with sensitivity = 90.0%/specificity = 89.9%. Ultimately, this study makes strides toward clinical validation through verifying biomarkers of hypoglycemia in hundreds of breath samples. These results may be translated to design a sensor array that could be integrated into a portable breathalyzer to increase glycemic control in persons with T1D.

Indexed as

BiomarkersDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1HypoglycemiaVolatile Organic CompoundsAdultBlood GlucoseBreath TestsCohort StudiesExhalationFemaleGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultBiomarkersBlood GlucoseVolatile Organic CompoundsExhaled breathGas chromatographyHypoglycemiaMass spectrometryType 1 diabetesVolatile organic compounds

Identifiers

PMID40414890
PMCPMC12104459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.