ArticleBMC public health2025
Breaking up prolonged sedentary behavior to improve cardiometabolic health (BREAK2): protocol for a dose-finding adaptive randomization trial.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05353322 (Breaking up Prolonged Sedentary Behavior to Improve Cardiometabolic Health), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Breaking up Prolonged Sedentary Behavior to Improve Cardiometabolic Health: An Adaptive Dose-Finding Study
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of an integrated exercise and dietary counseling program on physiological biomarkers in sedentary bank employees: a randomized control trial.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Review
- Accelerometry-measured prolonged and interrupted sedentary behavior and cancer incidence and mortality: A cohort study of 91,292 UK Biobank participants.PLoS medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundExcessive sedentary behavior is highly prevalent in developed nations and is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality. As such, health agencies have provided general recommendations to "sit less, move more" by interspersing brief periods of activity. However, a lack of empirical evidence describing how often (e.g. every 30 min, every 60 min) and for how long (e.g., 1 min activity bouts, 5 min activity bouts) sedentary time should be interrupted (a "sedentary break") to yield health benefit has precluded more quantitative, actionable guidelines. To date, rigorous and methodical dose escalation experiments have not been conducted to elucidate effective and tolerated sedentary break doses. The objective of the proposed study is to determine the minimally effective dose (e.g., the lowest dose) for two elements of a sedentary break (frequency and duration) that yields improvements in established CVD risk factors. The maximally tolerated dose (e.g. the highest dose that does not cause undue physical/psychological distress) for both frequency and duration of sedentary breaks will also be determined.
methodsThis study is a randomized crossover trial conducted under laboratory conditions among 324 adults without chronic medical conditions. Participants complete two trial conditions (8 h each), a sedentary break (intervention) condition and an uninterrupted sitting (control) condition, in a randomized order. The sedentary break condition consists of 1 of 25 possible frequency/duration combinations (e.g. walk every 30 min for 5 min), selected according to a Bayesian adaptive randomization method. Primary outcomes used to inform the adaptive randomization are glucose and blood pressure serially assessed over each trial condition. Constructs of dose toxicity (tolerability, safety, physical exhaustion/fatigue, and affect) are also serially assessed. DISCUSSION: This study will elucidate the minimally effective and maximally tolerated frequency and duration of a sedentary break that yields improvements in established CVD risk factors, information important for the development of quantitative sedentary behavior guidelines.
trial registrationThis trial has been registered with the Clinical Trials Registry maintained by the National Library of Medicine at the National Institutes of Health on April 29, 2022. The registration ID is NCT05353322.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.