Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40414628›Full record

Observational studyBMJ health & care informatics2025

Allergy alerting and overrides for opioid analogues across two health systems.

Rachel L Wasserman, Foster R Goss, Diane L Seger, Kimberly G Blumenthal, Ying-Chih Lo, Heba H Edrees, Sheril Varghese, Liqin Wang, Suzanne Blackley, David W Bates and 1 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ health & care informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rachel L WassermanDepartment of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA rwasserman@bwh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-2044-9408
Foster R GossDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Diane L SegerMass General Brigham Innovation Assembly Row, Somerville, Massachusetts, USA.
Kimberly G BlumenthalHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ying-Chih LoDepartment of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Heba H EdreesDepartment of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Sheril VargheseDepartment of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Liqin WangDepartment of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Suzanne BlackleyHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
David W BatesDepartment of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Li ZhouDepartment of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3874-4833

Funding

AHRQ HHS R01 HS025375
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDespite opioids comprising a majority of drug allergy alert (DAA) overrides, few studies have designed recommendations for clinical decision support (CDS) systems. We determined the frequency of opioid analogue DAA overrides and assessed DAAs overridden by patient and provider type, the most common allergic reactions documented in electronic health records (EHR), reaction severity, and associated hypersensitivity.

methodsWe conducted an observational cross-sectional study of DAAs in two geographically remote health systems. Patients were included if they were 18 years or older and had an opioid DAA generated when a medication was ordered. Patient and provider demographics, drug allergies, medication ordered, alert overrides, drug allergy reactions and DAA history were collected. Opioid analogue allergies were analysed by reaction type documented in the EHR, reaction severities (high, medium or low) and hypersensitivity reaction. Based on these factors, alerts were recommended to be interruptive requiring a coded response or changed to be non-interruptive (informational).

resultsThere were 700 493 alerts concerning opioid analogues fired for 50 527 patients across both sites, and 71.8% of these alerts were overridden. Nearly three-quarters of overridden reactions had a low to medium severity level at both institutions. Only 29.3% of the overridden alerts were truly immune-mediated. DISCUSSION: Our recommendations would reduce interruptive alerts in half by converting them to non-interruptive alerts (46.4%). The data suggest opportunities to improve opioid-related CDS systems.

conclusionsWe evaluated overrides of opioids and used this data to suggest ways to redesign DAAs to decrease alert override rates, combat alert fatigue and improve patient safety.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidDecision Support Systems, ClinicalDrug HypersensitivityMedical Order Entry SystemsMedication ErrorsAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAnalgesics, OpioidDecision Support Systems, ClinicalElectronic Health RecordsInformatics

Identifiers

PMID40414628
PMCPMC12104932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.