ArticleJournal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus2025
Evaluation of the QuickSee portable autorefractor system in a pediatric population.
Article in Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Instrument-based, non-cycloplegic versus cycloplegic refraction in pediatric and young adult populations (≤25 years): A systematic review and meta-analysis.Advances in ophthalmology practice and researchReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the QuickSee platform's ability to detect and measure refractive error relative to gold standard cycloplegic retinoscopy in a pediatric population in a clinical setting.
methodsChildren 3-17 years of age underwent visual acuity screening, autorefraction by the QuickSee (QS) or QuickSee Free (QSF), and complete ophthalmic examination, including cycloplegic retinoscopy and refraction. The agreement of the results was evaluated by Bland-Altman plots. Sensitivity and specificity for detecting myopia, anisometropia, and astigmatism were calculated based on modified Orinda and AAPOS 2021 guidelines. The overall accuracy of detecting refractive error was analyzed with receiver operating characteristic curves.
resultsA total of 157 children (mean age, 7.58 ± 2.62 years) underwent autorefraction by the QS system (QS/QSF), with a testability of 98.1%. Moderate-to-good agreement was seen in spherical equivalent (SE) and J
conclusionsIn our pediatric study cohort, the QS system effectively identified significant refractive error.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.