Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40414241›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Global health2025

Safety of nOPV2 administered during a supplementary immunisation activity in Uganda, 2022: data triangulation from a prospective cohort event monitoring programme and vaccine safety surveillance reports.

Ashley T Longley, Fred Nsubuga, Zunera Gilani, Farrell A Tobolowsky, Annet Kisakye, Sharon A Greene, Immaculate Ampeire, Vincent Fred Ssennono, Samuel Ofori Gyasi, Ismail Ntale and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Ashley T LongleyCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. Electronic address: ALongley@cdc.gov.
Fred NsubugaAfrican Field Epidemiology Network, Kampala, Uganda; Uganda Vaccines and Immunisation Division, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Zunera GilaniCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Farrell A TobolowskyCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Annet KisakyeWorld Health Organization, Kampala, Uganda.
Sharon A GreeneCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Immaculate AmpeireUganda National Expanded Program on Immunisation, Uganda Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Vincent Fred SsennonoUganda Bureau of Statistics, Kampala, Uganda.
Samuel Ofori GyasiWorld Health Organization, Kampala, Uganda.
Ismail NtaleUganda National Drug Authority, Kampala, Uganda.
Philip BammekeCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Brock StewartCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Helen Byomire NdagijeUganda National Drug Authority, Kampala, Uganda.
Daniel J KyabayinzeDirectorate of Public Health, Uganda Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Jane F GiduduCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn November, 2020, WHO authorised novel oral polio vaccine type 2 (nOPV2) use under Emergency Use Listing in response to outbreaks of circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus type 2 (cVDPV2). Although no concerns were identified in nOPV2 trials, the Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety requested more extensive vaccine safety data during emergency use. The Uganda Ministry of Health declared a cVDPV2 outbreak in 2021 and responded with an nOPV2 campaign in January, 2022. More than 9 million children aged 0-59 months were vaccinated, providing an opportunity to generate robust safety data.

methodsWe monitored the safety of nOPV2 for 42 days post-vaccination using: routine passive surveillance for adverse events following immunisation (AEFI); ongoing acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) surveillance; active, hospital-based surveillance for pre-specified adverse events of special interest (AESI); and active, cohort event monitoring. AFP cases were reviewed by the National Polio Expert Committee. Serious AEFI and all AESI and AFP cases with nOPV2 receipt underwent causality assessment by the National AEFI Committee.

findingsAcross surveillance systems, 1128 children vaccinated with nOPV2 experienced one or more AEFI: 43 children identified through passive surveillance, 128 suspected AFP cases, five AESI cases, and 952 children with reported AEFI through cohort event monitoring. Overall, 109 adverse events were considered serious; six (fever, gastroenteritis (n=3), acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, and encephalitis) were determined by the National AEFI Committee to be consistent with causal association to immunisation with nOPV2. No cases of vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis were detected. One death was detected, considered inconsistent with causal association to immunisation with nOPV2, per the National AEFI Committee.

interpretationNo new safety concerns were identified with nOPV2 use in Uganda following a national vaccination campaign, providing valuable data that informed WHO prequalification and product licensure.

fundingCenters for Disease Control and Prevention. TRANSLATION: For the French translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Indexed as

PoliomyelitisPoliovirus Vaccine, OralAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansImmunization ProgramsInfantInfant, NewbornMaleProspective StudiesUgandaPoliovirus Vaccine, Oral

Identifiers

PMID40414241
PMCPMC12213129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.