Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40413871›Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2025

An algorithmic perspective on deciphering cell-cell interactions with spatial omics data.

Mike van Santvoort, Federica Eduati

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mike van SantvoortDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Eindhoven University of Technology, Groene Loper 3, 5612AE Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Federica EduatiInstitute for Complex Molecular Systems, Eindhoven University of Technology, Groene Loper 3, 5612AE Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

Funding

Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) Gravitation programme IMAGINE! 24.005.009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advent of technologies to measure molecule information from a tissue that retains spatial information paved the way for the development of cell-cell interaction (CCI) methods. Even though these spatial technologies are still in their relative infancy, the developed methods promise more accurate analysis of CCIs due to the inclusion of spatial data. In this review, we outline these methods and provide a high-level view of the algorithms they employ. Moreover, we investigate how they deal with the spatial nature of the data they use and what types of downstream analyses they execute. We show that spatial CCI methods can broadly be classified into supervised learning, statistical correlation, and optimization methods that are used for either refinement of CCI networks, spatial clustering, differential expression analysis, or analysis of signal propagation through a tissue. In the end, we highlight some avenues for the development of complementary CCI methods that exploit advances in spatial data or alleviate certain downsides of the current methods.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCell CommunicationComputational BiologyCluster AnalysisHumanscell–cell interaction modelingoptimizationspatial dataspatial omicsstatistical correlationsupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID40413871
PMCPMC12103901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.