Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40413682›Full record

SynthesisTechniques in coloproctology2025

Left colectomy for diverticular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing robotic and laparoscopic resections.

H A Eltyeb, A Y Y Mohamedahmed, G A Mills, J Khan

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisComparative Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Techniques in coloproctology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

H A EltyebDepartment of General Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Queen Elizabeth Ave, Gateshead, NE9 6SX, UK. hazim.eltyeb1@nhs.net.ORCID 0000-0003-3370-754X
A Y Y MohamedahmedUniversity Hospitals of Derby and Burton, Uttoxeter Road Derby Derbyshire, Burton on Trent, DE22 3NE, UK.
G A MillsFaculty of Science, University of Portsmouth, St Michael's Building, Portsmouth, PO1 2DT, UK.
J KhanFaculty of Science, University of Portsmouth, St Michael's Building, Portsmouth, PO1 2DT, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAround 50% of people aged 60 years and above are affected by diverticular disease, and 25% of these individuals will require surgical intervention. Our objective is to compare the results of left colonic resection for sigmoid diverticular disease using both robotic and laparoscopic approaches. Our primary aim is to conduct a meta-analysis while investigating the rates of conversion to open surgery, stoma and complications between the two methods. METHODOLOGY: A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. A meta-analysis was performed using RevMan Version 5.4 software. The random-effect model was employed to pool dichotomous outcomes and estimate risk and odds ratios (OR).

resultsEight studies were thought to fulfil the eligibility criteria: 1892 patients (49.2%) had robotic surgery, and 1952 patients (50.84%) underwent a laparoscopic approach. There were fewer conversions to open surgery in the robotic group when compared to the laparoscopic group (P < 0.00001), a lower rate of postoperative ileus (P = 0.005), shorter length of stay (mean difference (MD) 0.18 P = 0.003) and fewer morbidities (P = 0.002). There were similar rates of stoma formation (4.7%, P = 1.00), anastomotic leak (2.6%, P = 0.85) and mortality (0.3% vs 0.2%, P = 0.59). The operative time was shorter in the robotic approach, although the difference was not significant (P = 0.47).

conclusionRobotic surgery is feasible for diverticular disease compared to laparoscopic left colectomy. Our study observed a reduction in the conversion to open rate, reduced morbidity, and less ileus while demonstrating similar rates of stoma formation, anastomotic leak, and mortality. However, more high-quality research needs to be conducted to investigate this further. The study is registered in Prospero (reg # CRD42023440509).

Indexed as

ColectomyDiverticular DiseasesLaparoscopyRobotic Surgical ProceduresAgedConversion to Open SurgeryFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsTreatment OutcomeColectomyDiverticular diseaseLaparoscopic surgeryRobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID40413682
PMCPMC12104100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.