ReviewMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2025
Advancements in Non-Invasive Intracranial Pressure Monitoring via Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter Measurement.
Review in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07786324 (Comparison of 3% Hypertonic Saline Versus 20% Mannitol in Reduction of Increased Intracranial Pressure in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury Using Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter Measurements''), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of 3% Hypertonic Saline Versus 20% Mannitol in Reduction of Increased Intracranial Pressure in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury Using Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter Measurements''
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preliminary Evaluation of Preoperative Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter and CT Mass Effect in Relation to Pre-Excision Invasive Intracranial Pressure During Intracranial Tumor Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Dynamic Changes in Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter on Computed Tomography Predict Decompressive Efficacy and Outcomes in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Derivative indices of optic nerve sheath diameter: a novel ultrasound-based approach for non-invasive intracranial pressure monitoring in neurocritical patients.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- A prospective study of transorbital ultrasound multimodal imaging in the detection and evaluation of increased intracranial pressure.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring is the mainstay of treatment for patients with brain tumors, hydrocephalus, cerebral edema, and traumatic brain injury (TBI). At present, there are 2 main monitoring methods: non-invasive and invasive. Although invasive monitoring of ICP is the criterion standard, non-invasive approaches based on measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) are becoming increasingly popular because of their simplicity, low cost, and accuracy. Ultrasound (US) measurement of ONSD is especially useful because it allows dynamic evaluation of ICP over the hospital and treatment period in a real-time manner and can be performed bedside for better patient acceptance. This paper reviews the research progress, and highlights the advantages, performance, and results of various ONSD measurement approaches, including US-based ONSD measurement, with regard to its principles, operation method, and clinical applications, as well as ONSD measurement by other techniques such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). New developments, including use of the ONSD/ocular transverse diameter (ETD) index and possible future studies on ONSD-based/assisted therapy and treatment for patients with TBI, stroke, and other conditions that can increase ICP will also be discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.