Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40413553›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2025

Predictors of orthorexia nervosa in women: eating attitudes, emotional regulation difficulties, anxiety, depression and self-esteem.

Elif Yöyen, Şenay Dereli, Tülay Güneri Barış

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elif YöyenDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Sakarya University, Sakarya, 54050, Türkiye. elifyoyen@sakarya.edu.tr.
Şenay DereliDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Institute of Social Sciences, Marmara University, Istanbul, 34722, Türkiye.
Tülay Güneri BarışDepartment of Health Sciences, Institute of Business Administration, Sakarya University, Sakarya, 54050, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although orthorexia nervosa, defined as excessive preoccupation with healthy food consumption, is not yet included as a disease in current classification systems (DSM-5, ICD-10), it is a psychopathology that is attracting increasing attention with a growing number of studies on the subject. The aim of this study was to examine the predictors of eating attitudes, emotion dysregulation, depression, anxiety and self-esteem in orthorexia nervosa, which are considered in the literature to be related to orthorexia nervosa. Data were collected using Eating Attitude Short Form, Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, Beck Depression Inventory, Beck Anxiety Inventory and Orthorexia Nervosa Rating Scale Short Form. Data were collected from 380 female participants via social media platforms using snowball sampling. Pearson correlation analysis, multiple linear regression analysis and hierarchical regression analysis were used for data analysis and significance was accepted as p < 0.05. Correlation analysis showed that there was a negative and moderate relationship between orthorexia nervosa and eating attitude scores (r = -.407**, p < .001). Linear regression analysis showed that eating attitude (β = -.393, t = -8.223, p < .01), depression (β = .141, t = 2.371, p < .05) and anxiety (β = -.147, t = -2.492, p < .05) scores were statistically significant predictors of the orthorexia nervosa scale scores. The established model explains 18.5% of the variance in the orthorexia nervosa score. Hierarchical regression analysis showed that eating attitude score (β = -.224, t = -8.651, p < .01) predicted orthorexia nervosa and the model explained 16.5% of the orthorexia nervosa score variance. In addition hierarchical regression analysis showed that the variables paying attention to diet (β = 1.052, t = 3.980, p < .01), eating natural foods (β = 1.405, t = 2.941, p < .01) and changing behaviour when given information about healthy eating (β = 1.322, t = 6.117, p < .01) predicted orthorexia nervosa scores and explained 32.1% of the variance. The results show that as pathological eating attitudes increase, orthorexia nervosa decreases, and as anxiety and depression levels increase, orthorexia nervosa increases. In addition, as people's tendency to eat natural foods, their tendency to pay attention to their diet, and the way they reflect this information in their behaviour increases, so do their levels of orthorexia nervosa. The results may guide clinicians in treatment and health policy developers in public health policy.

Indexed as

AnxietyDepressionEmotional RegulationFeeding and Eating DisordersFeeding BehaviorSelf ConceptAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMiddle AgedYoung AdultEating disordersMental healthOrthorexia nervosaWomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID40413553
PMCPMC12103789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.