ArticleWorld journal of emergency surgery : WJES2025
Every minute counts: a network meta-analysis comparing the effect of prophylactic endovascular procedures in abnormal placentation.
Article in World journal of emergency surgery : WJES, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage after pregnancy termination for fetal malformations: a retrospective study and internally validated prediction model.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Article
- Global landscape of maternal hemorrhage mortality: a 40-year analysis based on GBD 2021 study.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Article
- Surgical Management of Placenta Accreta Spectrum: A Five-Year Institutional Experience.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPreventing postpartum haemorrhage remains a high priority worldwide. We aimed to provide all available evidence comparing maternal and neonatal outcomes of different prophylactic endovascular procedures in patients with abnormal placentation.
methodsPubmed, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched from inception to Nov, 2024, using relevant key words. Studies comparing outcomes of women undergoing or not prophylactic endovascular procedures in planned cesarean delivery in patients with antenatally suspected or confirmed PAS, placenta previa or both were included. An arm-based random effect frequentist network meta-analysis was performed. All available maternal and neonatal outcomes were evaluated.
resultsThree randomized controlled trials and 59 observational studies were eligible reporting on 6973 women (42.9% did not undergo any endovascular procedure, 26.7% underwent aortic balloon occlusion, REBOA, 16.6%, internal iliac balloon occlusion, PBO-IIA, 5.8%, common iliac artery occlusion, PBO-CIA, placement, and 7.8% underwent uterine artery embolization, UAE). The pooled network analysis showed that all prophylactic endovascular procedures were associated with reduced perioperative blood loss, with proximal balloon occlusion (REBOA) having the strongest effect (SMD -1.80 L, 95%CI -2.38;-1.21; I
conclusionsAlthough the preponderance of observational studies suggests caution in interpreting the results of this meta-analysis, our findings suggest that prophylactic endovascular interventional procedures, particularly aortic balloon occlusion, may substantially improve clinical outcomes in women with PAS, placenta previa or both. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD4202457398.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.