ArticleBMC veterinary research2025
Estimating performances of dairy buffaloes in a new model of automated milking system.
Article in BMC veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn recent years automatic milking systems (AMS) have emerged as a technology that can improve traditional milking routine. AMS offer several benefits, such as regular milking routine, health of the mammary glands and labour efficiency, higher milk yield (MY), and quality. In contrast with dairy cows, the application of AMS in dairy buffalo herds remains underexplored. This study aimed to extend the current knowledge regarding AMS and evaluate for the first time the efficiency of new AMS models in buffalo species on a wide dataset, by focusing on MY and quality. Two sources of data were analysed: data collected at each milking by the AMS software for a duration of 22 months, and monthly milk yields and quality traits. The statistical analysis was performed through the R software. A mixed model for repeated measures was adopted, using days in milk (DIM) and parity as fixed factors and the visit/day of sampling as repeated measure. A linear regression model was also used to study the relationship between the number of milking per buffalo per day (as independent variable), lactation persistency, DIM, parity, somatic cell score (SCS), and MY (as dependent variables).
resultsThe effects of parity, DIM and their interaction were significant for all milk quality traits (monthly recordings), except for their interaction on somatic cell count (SCC) and SCS. An average of 2.35 milkings/buffalo was recorded, with a mean milking duration of 7.36 min. The average MY was 9.15 kg/day, with 7.97% and 4.81% fat and protein content, respectively and the lactation peak occurred at 38.17 ± 1.31 DIM. The difference between multiparous and primiparous was clear in terms of both MY and energy-corrected milk (ECM). Also, parity and DIM significantly influenced both average milk flow rate (1.49 kg/min on average) and peak milk flow rate (2.68 kg/min on average): these showed a comparable trend describing higher values during the first days in milk followed by a decrease throughout the lactation, along with a decreased milk production.
conclusionsThe present study was the first to investigate new model of AMS in buffalo species in a large dataset providing insight into the new model of AMS as an effective milking system for buffalo species. Still, further research is encouraged to confirm these findings, as well as to compare the performances of different automatic milking systems, possibly under different management practices and environmental conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.