ArticleActa neuropathologica communications2025
Evaluation of aggrephagy markers in myofibrillar myopathies.
Article in Acta neuropathologica communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Emerging Mechanisms and Therapeutic Strategies in Dilated Cardiomyopathy.Biomedicines · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myofibrillar Myopathies (MFMs) are a growing group of muscular disorders genetically determined, whose diagnosis is based on histological features as myofibrillar degeneration, Z-disk disorganization and protein aggregates' accumulation. Protein aggregates that do not fit the proteasome's narrow pore are targeted for removal via a specialized form of autophagy, called aggrephagy. Our study aims to investigate the potential pathogenic role of aggrephagy in 52 muscle samples from an Italian MFM multicentric cohort. We measured, the percentage of positive areas of key aggrephagy proteins by immunofluorescence staining, of sequestosome 1 (p62/SQSTM1), Neighbor of BRCA1 Gene 1 (NBR1), and ubiquitinated proteins (FK2) in 11 DES-, 6 DNAJB6-, 5 FLNC-, 18 MYOT- and 12 TTN-mutated patients. We showed that all aggrephagy markers are increased in these patients, regardless of the mutated genes, suggesting a possible common pathomechanism; no positive signal was found in healthy, age-matched controls. We analyzed the association between positivity levels of these markers, measured as percentage of positive areas, and selected clinical features utilizing generalized linear mixed models with gamma distribution as the probability model and center-specific random effects to better capture possible heterogeneity across participating centers. Our findings indicate significant associations between levels of p62, NBR1, and FK2 with age at biopsy (p62 and NBR1 p-values < 0.001, FK2 p-value < 0.05), age of onset (p62 and NBR1 p-values < 0.001, FK2 p-value < 0.01) and disease severity through Walton & Gardner-Medwin (WGM) score at biopsy (all p-values < 0.001) and at the last visit (all p-values < 0.05). Noteworthy, the aggrephagic pathway is mostly activated in MYOT-mutated patients compared to the other subgroups. Moreover, the association between aggrephagy and WGM score at biopsy is stronger in this subgroup. Overall, our study emphasizes the role of aggrephagy in MFMs across all patients, and its association with specific clinical parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.