ArticleBMC oral health2025
Bond strength of aged provisional 3D-printed methacrylate resin with different surface treatments and repair materials.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of Surface Conditioning Protocols and Lining Materials on the Fracture Resistance of Aged 3D-Printed Onlay Restorations.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2026Article
- Effect of air-borne particle abrasion and tribochemical silica coating on surface characteristics, mechanical behavior, and bonding performance of 3D-printed resin-based materials.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Chairside Repair of Provisional Restorative Materials: Effects of Material Type, Repair Protocol, and Thermocycling on Shear Bond Strength.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Repair Performance of Additively and Subtractively Manufactured Permanent Crown Materials: A Combined Mechanical and Optical Evaluation.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparative effects of plasma activation and monomer infiltration on the surface characteristics and wettability of 3D-printed permanent crown resin.Journal of dental sciences · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength and Surface Morphology (via SEM) of Different Provisional Crowns and Surface Treatments to PMMA.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Influence of surface pretreatments on the repair bond strength of 3D-printed resin used for permanent restorations: anFrontiers in dental medicine · 2026Article
- Bond strength of debonded orthodontic brackets after different reconditioning and priming protocols: An in vitro study.PloS one · 2026Article
- 3D printed teeth for bridge preparation training: development and assessment in dental education.BMC medical education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe provisional 3D-printed methacrylate resin is progressively used due to its superior accuracy and durability compared to traditionally fabricated provisional restorations. However, chairside modifications remain necessary to enhance marginal adaptation, esthetics, and functionality. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of surface treatments and repair materials on shear bond strength (SBS) of aged provisional 3D-printed methacrylate resin.
methodsA total of 120 specimens (20 mm in diameter and 15 mm in height) were designed, printed using a DLP resin-based 3D printer, and aged by thermocycling for 1,500 cycles. Specimens (n = 10) were divided into four groups based on surface treatments: no surface treatment (negative control, NC), airborne particle abrasion (Al
resultsFlowable composite exhibited the highest SBS when aged provisional 3D-printed methacrylate resin was treated with Al
conclusionTo achieve the optimal SBS between aged provisional 3D-printed methacrylate resin and repair/reline materials, surface preparation with Al₂O₃/Adh, Al₂O₃, or Adh followed by flowable composite is recommended. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: In clinical settings where airborne particle abrasion is unavailable or impractical, applying universal adhesive followed by flowable composite provides reliable bond strength to aged 3D-printed methacrylate resin. However, omitting surface treatment entirely is not recommended due to the significantly reduced bond strength.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.