Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40413494›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Determinants of doctor-doctor relationships among academic and clinical staff at a university hospital, Cairo, Egypt: a mixed method study.

Shaimaa Samy Yousef, Maha El Gaafary, Sahar Mohamed Sabbour, Sally Adel Hakim, Yosra S Abd El-Ghaffar, Abeer Hassan Ahmed, Omar Matar, Hoda I Fahim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shaimaa Samy YousefCommunity, Environmental, and Occupational Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. shaimaasamy@med.asu.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1980-5306
Maha El GaafaryCommunity, Environmental, and Occupational Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Sahar Mohamed SabbourCommunity, Environmental, and Occupational Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Sally Adel HakimCommunity, Environmental, and Occupational Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Yosra S Abd El-GhaffarCommunity, Environmental, and Occupational Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Abeer Hassan AhmedCommunity, Environmental, and Occupational Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Omar MatarCommunity, Environmental, and Occupational Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Hoda I FahimCommunity, Environmental, and Occupational Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGood work boosts mental health, self-esteem, and earnings, while physicians are more likely to experience burnout and dissatisfaction with work-life balance, leading to decreased productivity. This study aimed to identify the factors shaping the relationship between medical staff in academic and clinical departments and to describe the overall working environment.

methodsThe current study was conducted among demonstrators/residents, assistant lecturers, and lecturers from academic and clinical departments of a tertiary care hospital in Cairo, Egypt. Mixed methods were used. For the quantitative part, a comparative cross-sectional study was conducted on 228 clinical and 89 academic participants. The Doctor-Doctor Relationship and Workplace Environment Evaluation Scale (DDRWEE) was computed using 18 statements with a 3-point Likert scale. For the qualitative part, 16 in-depth interviews were conducted with 8 clinical and 8 academic participants.

resultsThe mean age of academic staff was 32.8 ± 4.5 versus 30.9 ± 4.2 for clinical staff. The factors decreasing the DDRWEE Score were being clinical staff, weak scientific advantages from colleagues, weak practical advantages from seniors, weak ethical advantages from seniors, and thinking of resignation or changing career. For the qualitative part, six themes were generated: Factors affecting relations with colleagues both specifically and generally; Reliability of the statement: "When I become a senior, I will treat juniors the same way I was treated"; Causes of strained relationships between colleagues and reflections from personal experiences; Factors that enhance colleague relationships and reflections from personal experiences; Behavior of colleagues in the department when someone faces accountability: and Qualities of an ideal doctor and suggestions for creating a better doctor-to-doctor work environment.

conclusionThe study emphasized the importance of creating a supportive academic and professional environment for medical staff, addressing their practical and emotional needs. This research suggests that while the DDRWEE score has good internal validity, external validation is needed for its wider applicability. LIMITATIONS: The study's generalizability to Egyptian physicians is limited due to sample convenience, the need for external validation of the DDRWEE score, and potential reporting bias due to the self-administered questionnaire.

Indexed as

Faculty, MedicalHospitals, UniversityInterprofessional RelationsMedical Staff, HospitalPhysiciansAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEgyptFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicJob SatisfactionMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesAcademicClinicalDDRWEEDoctor-Doctor relationship and workplace environment evaluation scaleQualitative study

Identifiers

PMID40413494
PMCPMC12102795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.