Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40413491›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Self-efficacy of clinical performance in nursing students and its relationship with the motivation of field choice and clinical education status.

Maryam Momeni, Mohammadreza Asadi, Haniyeh Shadin, Sajad Noorian, Mojtaba Senmar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maryam MomeniSocial Determinants of Health Research Center, Research Institute for Prevention of Non-Communicable Diseases, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
Mohammadreza AsadiStudent Research Committee, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
Haniyeh ShadinStudent Research Committee, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
Sajad NoorianDepartment of Statistics, Faculty of Science, University of Qom, Qom, Iran.
Mojtaba SenmarSocial Determinants of Health Research Center, Research Institute for Prevention of Non-Communicable Diseases, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran. senmarmojtaba@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6011-4267

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionClinical performance self-efficacy is an important element in providing safe care, and it has an important place in nursing education. the self-efficacy of clinical performance can be affected by various factors such as motivation and clinical education status. Therefore, the present study was conducted to investigate the self-efficacy of clinical performance and its relationship with the motivation of choosing a field of study and the status of clinical education in nursing students.

methodsThis descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in 2024 among 237 nursing students at Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, located in the northwest of Iran. The sample population of this study included in the study by census method. The data collection tools in this study included a demographic information checklist, clinical performance self-efficacy scale, study field motivation Questionnaire, and clinical education status Questionnaire.

resultsThe results showed that the self-efficacy of clinical performance with mean of 127.88 ± 21.79 is at the desired level. Motivation was at a good level with mean of 40.50 ± 8.44. The results also showed that the state of clinical education with mean of 100.27 ± 21.90 is at the average level. The results of the multivariate regression analysis showed that, with an increase of one unit of the motivation to choose a field, the self-efficacy of clinical performance increases by mean of 0.985 units (P < 0.001), but the state of clinical education does not significantly predict self-efficacy of clinical performance (P = 0.294).

conclusionBased on the results of this study, self-efficacy of clinical performance and motivation in nursing students is in a favorable and good condition, but the condition of clinical education is at an average level. The results of this study also indicated that motivation for choosing a field of study plays a significant role in predicting self-efficacy of clinical performance. Adopting motivational enhancement approaches and improving the quality of clinical education can contribute to the promotion of self-efficacy in the clinical performance of nursing students.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceMotivationSelf EfficacyStudents, NursingAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEducational StatusFemaleHumansIranMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultEducationMotivationNursing studentSelf-efficacy

Identifiers

PMID40413491
PMCPMC12103782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.