ArticleBMC palliative care2025
Machine learning model for prediction of palliative care phases in patients with advanced cancer: a retrospective study.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of the assessment model for palliative care needs in cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Review
- Exploration of the Prediction of the Survival Cycle and Influencing Factors of Chinese Patients With Advanced Cancer Based on Multi-Model Analysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Article
- Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Care of Terminally Ill Patients.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDeveloping an accurate predictive model for palliative care phases is crucial for improving cancer patient management, enabling healthcare providers to identify those in need of specific care plans and streamlining decision-making process for patients and caregivers. This study aims to identify symptom and functional indicators from Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration (PCOC) data and develop a predictive model capable of accurately categorizing palliative care phases in advanced cancer patients.
methodsA retrospective cohort study design was adopted in this study. Data on PCOC information were collected and analyzed from patients admitted to a palliative care unit at a cancer hospital in China between April 2023 and December 2024. The Gradient Boosting Decision Tree in the machine learning algorithm to establish a palliative care phase prediction model and evaluated the prediction performance of this model.
resultsA total of 9,787 assessments from 793 patients were included in the analysis of this study. Significant differences were identified among the four PCOC phases of care in terms of the symptom distress, palliative care problem severity, functional status and daily living activities. The machine learning model developed in this study achieved areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.997, 0.996, 0.999, and 0.999 for predicting the stable, unstable, deteriorating, and terminal phases in the training group, respectively. In the testing group, the corresponding AUCs were 0.976, 0.965, 0.971, and 0.998.
conclusionsThe prediction model developed in this study based on the machine learning algorithm showed good performance, offering significant potential for facilitating timely interventions, enhancing symptom management, and optimizing palliative care resource allocation in advanced cancer patients in mainland China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.