Trial reportBMC neurology2025
Effectiveness of the Roy adaptation model-based nursing intervention in improving physiological, psychological, and social outcomes in patients with Parkinson's disease.
Trial report in BMC neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The Effect of Tooth Loss on Depression and Anxiety Among Older Adults in China: The Mediating Role of Dietary Diversity.Nutrients · 2026Article
- A roy adaptation model-based care program and its impact on quality of life in patients with acute coronary syndrome: A randomized controlled trial.ARYA atherosclerosis · 2026Article
- Social support may not impact physical function outcomes following a tango or walking intervention in people with Parkinson's disease: an exploratory analysis of a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a comprehensive nursing intervention based on Roy's Adaptation Model (RAM) in improving quality of life, psychological adaptation, and social functioning in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD).
methodsA total of 96 patients with idiopathic PD were randomly assigned to the RAM group or the usual care group. The RAM intervention included a 3-month program addressing physiological, psychological, role function, and interdependence adaptation needs. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months using the Scale for Outcomes in Parkinson' s Disease - Autonomic Symptoms (SCOPA-AUT), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES), Parkinson' s Disease Social Functioning Scale (PDSFS), Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), and Parkinson' s Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39).
resultsThe RAM group demonstrated significant improvements in autonomic function, sleep quality, and fatigue compared to the usual care group (SCOPA-AUT, PSQI, and FSS). Psychological adaptation improved with reduced depressive and anxiety symptoms (BDI-II and BAI) and increased self-efficacy (GSES). Role function and interdependence adaptation were significantly enhanced, as indicated by higher PDSFS and MSPSS scores. Quality of life, assessed using PDQ-39, showed significant and sustained improvements across all domains, including mobility, activities of daily living, emotional well-being, and social support.
conclusionThe RAM-based care intervention effectively enhanced physiological and psychological outcomes, social functioning, and quality of life in PD patients, highlighting its value in promoting holistic, patient-centered nursing care. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.