ArticleBMC public health2025
Quality and reliability evaluation of pancreatic cancer-related video content on social short video platforms: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Baloxavir marboxil-related information on Douyin and Xiaohongshu: a cross-sectional analysis of content, misinformation, and user engagement.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Quality and reliability of osteoporosis-related health information on short-video platforms: a multi-source cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Quality assessment of ADHD-related short videos on Chinese social media: A cross-sectional study.Medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluating pulpitis-related content on Chinese social media: platform comparison, dental practitioner impact and associated factors.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Information quality and reliability of pheochromocytoma-related videos on tiktok and Kwai: a cross-sectional study.BMC urology · 2026Article
- Article
- Evaluation of the quality and reliability of infertility information on Chinese social media platforms Bilibili and TikTok : a cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Quality, reliability, and engagement of COPD-related videos on Chinese short-form video platforms: a cross-sectional content analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Quality and content evaluation of male HPV infection on Bilibili and TikTok: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The quality and reliability of short videos about choledocholithiasis on TikTok and Bilibili in China.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Quality, reliability, and content completeness of Chinese-language short videos on impacted wisdom teeth on TikTok and Bilibili: a cross-sectional study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- The quality of video information related to smoking cessation on mainstream short-video platforms in China: a cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Quality and dissemination of nasopharyngeal cancer health information on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-sectional study.Medicine · 2026Article
- Quality and reliability of vascular cognitive impairment-related information on Chinese social media platforms.Medicine · 2026Article
- The quality and reliability of short videos about Sjögren syndrome on TikTok and Bilibili: A cross-sectional study.Medicine · 2026Article
- Assessing quality and reliability of online videos on peritoneal dialysis: a Douyin video-based study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPancreatic cancer (PC) has become one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Social media platforms are widely used for health information dissemination because of their visual appeal and entertainment value. This study evaluates the content, quality, and reliability of PC-related information on domestic short video platforms.
methodsA total of 265 PC-related videos were retrieved from three short video-sharing platforms: TikTok, Bilibili, and Kwai. The Global Quality Scale (GQS) and the modified DISCERN score were employed to evaluate the quality and content of the videos, respectively. Correlation analysis was conducted to explore the relationships between different video variables.
resultsThe overall quality of the video content was low, with median scores of 2 (IQR: 2-3) for both the GQS and the modified DISCERN score. Most of the videos related to PC were posted by healthcare professionals (219/265, 82.6%). Videos from specialists received more likes on short social video platforms than those from nonspecialists did (median: 678 vs. 270, P = 0.005). Educational videos scored highest in both the GQS (median: 3, IQR 2-3) and the modified DISCERN score (median: 2.5, IQR 2-3). There was a positive correlation between GQS and video duration (r = 0.31, P < 0.01) and the modified DISCERN score (r = 0.434, P < 0.001).
conclusionThe quality and reliability of the videos on these platforms were generally unsatisfactory in terms of source and content. Videos produced by healthcare professionals or institutions are more informative in terms of comprehensiveness, quality of information, and reliability than are those produced by non-healthcare professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.