Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40413438›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Using the Q-method to explore pregnant and breastfeeding women's perceptions of antibiotic use in Mahajanga, Northwest Madagascar.

Sitraka Rakotosamimanana, Aina Harimanana, Timothée Razafindrabesa, Voahirana Ravololomihanta, Laurent Kapesa, Chiarella Mattern, Daouda Kassié

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sitraka RakotosamimananaInstitut Pasteur de Madagascar, Antananarivo, 101, Madagascar.
Aina HarimananaInstitut Pasteur de Madagascar, Antananarivo, 101, Madagascar.
Timothée RazafindrabesaInstitut Pasteur de Madagascar, Antananarivo, 101, Madagascar.
Voahirana RavololomihantaDirection de la santé Familiale, Ministère de la santé Publique de la République de Madagascar, Antananarivo, 101, Madagascar.
Laurent KapesaUnited States Agency for International Development, Antananarivo, 101, Madagascar.
Chiarella MatternInstitut Pasteur de Madagascar, Antananarivo, 101, Madagascar.
Daouda KassiéInstitut Pasteur de Madagascar, Antananarivo, 101, Madagascar. daoudak@pasteur.mg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Q-method is a research approach that combines quantitative and qualitative techniques to study people's subjectivity on a given theme. In Madagascar, antibiotic usage practices remain largely unstudied, particularly among pregnant and breastfeeding women. This study aims to use the Q-method to document the opinions of pregnant and breastfeeding women on antibiotic use practices in the Northwest region of Madagascar.

methodsThe Q-method was applied to 115 pregnant and breastfeeding women from two districts, one urban and one rural, in Northwest Madagascar. The participants ranked 36 statements about antibiotic use on a 7-point scale ranging from - 3 (strong disagreement) to + 3 (strong agreement). Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to analyze the rankings and identify groups of women with differing or similar viewpoints. The Wilcoxon and Kruskal-Wallis rank sum tests were employed to assess significant differences among participants in each group and to evaluate the differences between these groups. Additionally, semistructured interviews were conducted to explore the participants' reasoning behind their rankings and to complement the quantitative findings.

resultsAmong the 115 women, 51% (59/115) resided in urban areas, while 49% (56/115) lived in rural regions. PCA identified two main groups of women with distinct viewpoints on antibiotic use. Group 1 comprised 55.6% (64/115) of the women and consisted of women who only complied with medical indications and instructions by being vigilant. Group 2 represented 35.6% (41/115) of the respondents and included women who believed in antibiotic usage based on receiving information first from multiple sources (medical staff or personal experience or other nonmedical relatives). 10 women (8.8%) could not be classified under either of the two groups. Differences in opinions were observed in Group 1 based on age (p = 0.004), marital status (p = 0.013), educational level (p = 0.007), gravidity (p = 0.062), and area of residence (p = 0.125), and in Group 2 based on educational level (p = 0.065) and gravidity (p = 0.127). Insights from the semistructured interviews enriched the interpretation of these groups' classification.

conclusionsPregnant and breastfeeding women surveyed in Northwest Madagascar believe that the best approach to antibiotic use is to follow the recommendations of health care professionals. However, some rely on advice from others, whether medical or nonmedical. To improve adherence to antibiotic treatments based solely on medical prescriptions and ensure their proper use in Madagascar, the communication between health care providers and patients must be strengthened.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBreast FeedingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePregnant PeopleAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMadagascarPregnancyQualitative ResearchRural PopulationYoung AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibioticsMadagascarPerceptionsPregnant and breastfeeding womenQ-method

Identifiers

PMID40413438
PMCPMC12103045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.