ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
The impact of nuchal ligament ossification resection on cervical stability after modified laminoplasty: a long-term follow-up study.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
STUDY
designA retrospective study.
objectivesThis study aims to investigate the relationship between the resection of ossification of the nuchal ligament (ONL), its morphological features, and cervical stability following modified laminoplasty.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the data of patients diagnosed as degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) who underwent modified laminoplasty with muscle-ligament complex (MLC) reconstruction in our hospital between July 2018 and October 2022. Demographic information (e.g., age, gender), cervical sagittal parameters, cervical angular displacement (AD), cervical horizontal displacement (HD), range of motion and patient-reported outcomes were compared between patients with and without ONL.
resultsThe cervical AD at C4-C5, C5-C6 and cervical HD at C5-6 were significantly higher in ONL (+) group than ONL (-) group before surgery and at the 24-month follow-up time (p < 0.05, all). The AD and HD at C4-C5 and C5-C6 were higher in ONL (+) segments before surgery and at the 24-month follow-up (p < 0.05, all). But the values of AD or HD were lower in ONL (+) segments at 3- or 6-month follow-up (p < 0.05, all). ONL (+) group with two or more consecutive segments demonstrate significantly increased cervical AD and HD at the C4-C5 level after a 24-month follow-up period (p < 0.01, both).
conclusionResection of the ONL, particularly involving ≥ 2 cervical segments, is moderately associated with an increased likelihood of cervical instability and abnormal sagittal alignment in long-term follow-up after laminoplasty. Reconstruction of the MLC during laminoplasty may enhance cervical stability in the early follow-up period. For DCM patients with long segmental ONL, more attention should be paid to protecting the MLC structure during posterior cervical surgery. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.