Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40413408›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2025

Six solutions for clinical study data sharing in Germany.

Evgeny Bobrov, Christina Habermehl, Daniel Strech, Tracey Weissgerber, René Bernard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Evgeny BobrovQUEST Center for Responsible Research, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. evgeny.bobrov@bih-charite.de.
Christina HabermehlQUEST Center for Responsible Research, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Daniel StrechQUEST Center for Responsible Research, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Tracey WeissgerberQUEST Center for Responsible Research, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
René BernardQUEST Center for Responsible Research, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

Germany's Excellence Strategy of the DFG (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) EXC-2049-390688087
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sharing clinical study data is endorsed by many funders and journals, international policy frameworks, and patients. Reuse of clinical study data demonstrably improves health research, and emerging technologies may enhance the value derived from shared data. Unfortunately, clinical research has failed to harness the transformative power of data sharing, and sharing remains the exception. This opinion piece focuses on the massive obstacles to sharing clinical study data in Germany, which results in very low sharing rates, wasted resources, and frustration among local researchers and international partners. We argue that this sharing crisis demands immediate and concerted action. As a remedy, we propose six feasible steps to boost clinical study data availability in Germany, derived from our experience consulting researchers and exploring solutions with international partners. Our recommendations target ethics committees, trial registries, infrastructures, and governance, while addressing data protection concerns. These measures must be flanked by further actions to foster data sharing skills and knowledge as well as, most importantly, the provision of appropriate incentives. Nevertheless, the proposed changes would be a breakthrough for clinical study data sharing in Germany, removing barriers regarding infrastructures, awareness, legal uncertainty, and responsibilities.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchClinical Trials as TopicInformation DisseminationGermanyHumansRegistries

Identifiers

PMID40413408
PMCPMC12103796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.