ArticleMolecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Developing a disease-specific accessible transcriptional signature as a biomarker for ataxia with oculomotor apraxia type 2.
Article in Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGenetic ataxias are clinically heterogenous neurodegenerative conditions often involving rare or private mutations and it is often difficult to assign pathogenicity to rare gene variants solely based on DNA sequencing. An effective functional assay from an easy-to-obtain biospecimen would aid this assessment and be of high clinical value. SETX encodes a ubiquitous DNA/RNA helicase crucial for resolving R-loops and maintaining genome stability. Loss-of-function mutations cause a recessive disorder, Ataxia with Oculomotor Apraxia Type 2 (AOA2).
methodsHere we utilize Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) from patient blood to construct an AOA2-specific transcriptomic signature as a biomarker to evaluate SETX variants in patients clinically suspected of having AOA2.
resultsWGCNA from peripheral blood RNA of 11 AOA2 patients from 7 families initially identified a single gene module that was modestly effective in distinguishing individuals with AOA2 from controls (sensitivity 73%, specificity 97%) and was able to robustly differentiate AOA2 patients from those with genetically distinct, yet phenotypically similar, neurological disorders (sensitivity 100%, specificity 100%). An independent derivation of the transcriptional biomarker identified a dual module model that was able to better distinguish individuals with AOA2 from controls (sensitivity 100%, specificity 97%). As validation, we examined a second cohort of 21 patients from 13 families and demonstrate that this dual module transcriptional biomarker could discriminate patients clinically suspected of AOA2 from controls (57%, 95%CI: 34%-78%). Overall, the transcriptional biomarker was able to separate AOA2 subjects (n = 32) from controls (n = 35) with 72% sensitivity and 97% specificity. Notably, this transcriptomic biomarker enabled verification of the first pathogenic SETX mutation found in a non-canonical transcript, expanding the spectrum of mutations that contribute to AOA2.
conclusionsOur study identified a transcriptional biomarker that was able to differentiate AOA2 from controls and from other related neurological disorders, consequently expanding the spectrum of known pathogenic mutations. This proof-of-concept study illustrates that transcriptional biomarkers may be used to validate variants of uncertain significance in known genetic diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.