Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40413391›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2025

Respiratory telerehabilitation: user experience and satisfaction with the program.

Neuza Reis, Maria José Costa Dias, Luís Sousa, João Oliveira, Miguel Toscano Rico, Cristina Lavareda Baixinho, Maria Adriana Henriques

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Neuza ReisNursing Research, Innovation and Development Centre of Lisbon (CIDNUR), Lisbon, 1900-160, Portugal. neuza.reis@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8126-765X
Maria José Costa DiasNursing Research, Innovation and Development Centre of Lisbon (CIDNUR), Lisbon, 1900-160, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4136-3938
Luís SousaHigher School of Atlantic Health, 2730-036, Barcarena, Oeiras, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9708-5690
João OliveiraJoão Oliveira, nurse Mental health and psychiatric specialist, Unidade Local de Saúde São José (ULS São José), Lisboa, 1150-199, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5221-5394
Miguel Toscano RicoNOVA Medical School|Faculdade de Ciências Médicas (NMS|FCM), Unidade Local de Saúde São José (ULS São José), Lisboa, Lisboa, 1150-199, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1210-2325
Cristina Lavareda BaixinhoNursing Research, Innovation and Development Centre of Lisbon (CIDNUR), Lisbon, 1900-160, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7417-1732
Maria Adriana HenriquesLisbon Nursing School. Nursing Research, Innovation and Development Centre of Lisbon (CIDNUR), Lisboa, 1900-160, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0288-6653

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rise of telehealth in geriatric care is an inexorable movement toward adapting to global digitalization trends, in terms of both technology and implementation experiences, with clear gains for health systems and citizens. A literature review shows that the older population, with lower levels of digital literacy, faces specific challenges with this type of service. The aim of this study was to understand the way older people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease or long COVID perceive the implementation of telerehabilitation programs to meet their healthcare needs.

methodsA qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews to answer the research question: How do older people perceive telerehabilitation programs? The study participants were 17 people aged ≥ 65 years old who had completed a respiratory telerehabilitation program at a Portuguese hospital. The interviews were submitted to content analysis using WebQDA

resultsThe study participants had an average age of 70.94 ± 7.44 years old. The content of the interviews with these older people points to easy adaptation to the telerehabilitation program. Three categories and their respectives subcategories emerged from the content analysis: (1) access and continuity of care (access, continuity of care, and self-management); (2) presence (communication with the team and maintaining relationships); and (3) experience in the program (comfort, advantages, and difficulties).

conclusionsThis study allows for an understanding of how older people perceive participation in telerehabilitation programs, what they value, and the difficulties they experience. It makes it possible to make recommendations for clinic practice and research into this emerging area of health care.

Indexed as

COVID-19Patient SatisfactionPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveTelerehabilitationAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMalePortugalQualitative ResearchTelemedicineContinuity of careGeriatric careRehabilitationRespiratoryTelehealth

Identifiers

PMID40413391
PMCPMC12102788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.