ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2025
Stroke prediction in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation using machine learning combined clinical and left atrial appendage imaging phenotypic features.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cardiac CT Roadmap for Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: From Planning to Strategy to Follow-Up.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the primary etiologies for ischemic stroke, and it is of paramount importance to delineate the risk phenotypes among elderly AF patients and to investigate more efficacious models for predicting stroke risk.
methodsThis single-center prospective cohort study collected clinical data and cardiac computed tomography angiography (CTA) images from elderly AF patients. The clinical phenotypes and left atrial appendage (LAA) radiomic phenotypes of elderly AF patients were identified through K-means clustering. The independent correlations between these phenotypes and stroke risk were subsequently analyzed. Machine learning algorithms-Logistic Regression, Naive Bayes, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest, and Extreme Gradient Boosting-were selected to develop a predictive model for stroke risk in this patient cohort. The model was assessed using the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve, Hosmer-Lemeshow tests, and Decision Curve Analysis.
resultsA total of 419 elderly AF patients (≥ 65 years old) were included. K-means clustering identified three clinical phenotypes: Group A (cardiac enlargement/dysfunction), Group B (normal phenotype), and Group C (metabolic/coagulation abnormalities). Stroke incidence was highest in Group A (19.3%) and Group C (14.5%) versus Group B (3.3%). Similarly, LAA radiomic phenotypes revealed elevated stroke risk in patients with enlarged LAA structure (Group B: 20.0%) and complex LAA morphology (Group C: 14.0%) compared to normal LAA (Group A: 2.9%). Among the five machine learning models, the SVM model achieved superior prediction performance (AUROC: 0.858 [95% CI: 0.830-0.887]).
conclusionThe stroke-risk prediction model for elderly AF patients constructed based on the SVM algorithm has strong predictive efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.