ArticleBMC geriatrics2025
Auditory processing and its cognitive correlates in older adults with mild cognitive impairment.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Auditory Biomarkers in Neurodegenerative Disorders: A Literature Review.Journal of otology · 2026Review
- The auditory trap: early semantic conflict and late monitoring breakdown drive false memories in cognitive aging.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAge-related central auditory processing disorder (CAPD) is linked to cognitive decline in older adults, potentially preceding Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) by several years. While studies indicate that all auditory processing domains are impacted, it remains unclear which domain most significantly correlates with cognitive functions in MCI, warranting further investigation into these relationships. The current study investigated auditory processing deficits and their relationship with cognitive performance in older adults with MCI.
methodThe study recruited 70 participants aged 60 to 72 years, divided into two groups: MCI(n = 35) and healthy controls (n = 35) based on Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores. Comprehensive central auditory processing and cognitive assessments were done.
resultsThe MCI group showed significant deficits across all auditory processing and cognitive domains. The enhanced right ear advantage in the dichotic test could be due to corpus callosum atrophy affecting left ear processing. Different factor structures in MCI suggest that they relied more on attentional resources for complex auditory tasks. Temporal processing tests showed high sensitivity in identifying MCI, with strong AUC and R² values, underscoring their clinical relevance.
conclusionTemporal processing deficits could serve as an early screening tool for cognitive decline in older adults. Larger studies targeting individuals with age-related hearing loss (ARHL) and MCI are essential, given the prevalence of ARHL in this population. Research should also examine the impact of tailored auditory training on cognitive function in MCI to inform interventions.
trial registrationThe study was registered in the Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI/2023/06/054277) on 21/06/2023 ( http://ctri.nic.in/ ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.