ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2025
Validation of the prognostic model "oncologiq palliative" for head and neck cancer patients.
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decisional Conflict in Palliative Head and Neck Cancer Patients.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- A study protocol for individualized prognostic counselling in the palliative phase.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposePatients diagnosed with incurable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) have a poor prognosis, with a median survival of approximately five months. Physicians often struggle to predict prognosis accurately and tend to overestimate survival. Timely sharing of validated accurate individual information on life expectancy could aid in facilitating better patient counseling. However, this knowledge is lacking. Therefore, the aim of this study is to conduct temporal and external validation of the prognostic model OncologIQ Palliative to assess its accuracy and generalizability.
methodsThe validation procedure involved temporal assessment in a retrospective cohort of 355 palliative HNSCC patients from Erasmus MC (2017-2020), followed by external validation in a retrospective cohort of 44 patients from Leiden University Medical Center (2019-2021).The discriminative ability of OncologIQ Palliative was assessed using the C-index and calibration was evaluated through graphical assessment, intercept, and slope.
resultsThe temporal cohort had a median follow-up of 115 days, and the external cohort 143 days. The model showed moderate discriminative ability in temporal validation (C-index 0.66) and better discrimination in external validation (C-index 0.71). Reasonable agreement was observed between predicted and observed 6-month and 1-year survival rates, with some deviations from the perfect calibration line.
conclusionThe validation methods conducted in this study underscored the reliability of OncologIQ Palliative. They showed adequate calibration and discrimination in both validation procedures, thereby facilitating the provision of more accurate prognostic counselling for head and neck cancer patients in the palliative phase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.