Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40413276›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Design optimization of university ideological and political education system based on deep learning.

Shangle Ai, Huanhuan Ding

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shangle AiSchool of Public Administration, Guangdong University of Finance, Guangzhou, 510521, China.
Huanhuan DingSchool of Management, Guangzhou Xinhua University, Guangzhou, 510520, China. 1002266062@ucsiuniversity.edu.my.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study seeks to enhance the effectiveness and student engagement in university ideological and political education (IPE) by leveraging deep learning technology. Traditional IPE approaches often fall short in terms of flexibility and interactivity, resulting in diminished student participation. The advancement of deep learning technology offers new opportunities for IPE due to its powerful capabilities in feature extraction and pattern recognition. This research employs a CNN-LSTM hybrid model, integrating Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and Long Short Term Memory (LSTM). By analyzing students' learning needs and interests, personalized learning paths and resource recommendations are provided for them. Firstly, this paper introduces the research methods in detail, including deep learning algorithm and model design, as well as the optimization design process of IPE system. The hybrid model combines the advantages of CNN in feature extraction and the ability of LSTM in processing sequence data to realize accurate analysis of IPE data. In the discussion part of experiment and result analysis, the model is trained and verified by collecting multi-channel data related to university IPE and using high-performance server. The results show that CNN-LSTM hybrid model is superior to traditional methods such as SVM and random forest in accuracy, recall and F1 score. This proves the powerful ability of deep learning model in dealing with complex data and capturing the internal laws and relationships of data. This study optimizes the design of university IPE system through deep learning technology, which not only improves the pertinence and effectiveness of education, but also provides new ideas and directions for the application of deep learning in the field of education.

Indexed as

CNN-LSTMDeep learningIdeological and political education systemOptimization

Identifiers

PMID40413276
PMCPMC12103489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.