ArticleScientific reports2025
SOC estimation for a lithium-ion pouch cell using machine learning under different load profiles.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A case study to compare the methods of SOC estimation for lithium-ion batteries using second-order RC circuit model.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Evaluation of a hybrid battery digital twin for joint SOC-SOE estimation under real driving conditions.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Temporal-aware transformer networks for state of charge multi-output prediction in unmanned aerial vehicle lithium-ion batteries.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Estimating the state of charge of lithium-ion battery systems is important for efficient battery management systems. This work conducts a thorough evaluation of multiple SOC estimate methods, including both classic approaches Coulomb Counting and extended Kalman filter and machine learning techniques under different load profile on lithium-ion pouch cell. The assessment included a variety of experimental data collected from entire cycles, shallow cycles, and dynamic operations utilizing the Worldwide Harmonized Light Vehicles Test Procedure and Hybrid Pulse Power Characterization tests done from 100% to 10% SOC. While traditional approaches performed well under ordinary settings, they had severe limits during shallow cycling. In contrast, machine learning technologies, notably the random forest method, performed better across all testing conditions. The random forest approach showed outstanding accuracy while minimizing error metrics (RMSE: 0.0229, MSE: 0.0005, MAE: 0.0139) and effectively handled typical issues such as SOC drift and ageing effects. These findings validate random forest as a dependable and robust approach for real-time SOC estimation in battery management systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.