Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40413268›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

SOC estimation for a lithium-ion pouch cell using machine learning under different load profiles.

J Harinarayanan, P Balamurugan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

J HarinarayananSchool of Electrical Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, 600127, India.
P BalamuruganSchool of Electrical Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, 600127, India. balamurugan.p@vit.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Estimating the state of charge of lithium-ion battery systems is important for efficient battery management systems. This work conducts a thorough evaluation of multiple SOC estimate methods, including both classic approaches Coulomb Counting and extended Kalman filter and machine learning techniques under different load profile on lithium-ion pouch cell. The assessment included a variety of experimental data collected from entire cycles, shallow cycles, and dynamic operations utilizing the Worldwide Harmonized Light Vehicles Test Procedure and Hybrid Pulse Power Characterization tests done from 100% to 10% SOC. While traditional approaches performed well under ordinary settings, they had severe limits during shallow cycling. In contrast, machine learning technologies, notably the random forest method, performed better across all testing conditions. The random forest approach showed outstanding accuracy while minimizing error metrics (RMSE: 0.0229, MSE: 0.0005, MAE: 0.0139) and effectively handled typical issues such as SOC drift and ageing effects. These findings validate random forest as a dependable and robust approach for real-time SOC estimation in battery management systems.

Indexed as

Coulomb countingLi-ion pouch cellLoad profileMachine learningState of charge

Identifiers

PMID40413268
PMCPMC12103532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.