ArticleScientific reports2025
Causes of drug-induced photosensitivity: an analysis using FDA adverse event reporting system database.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Community sunbed use and photosensitivity reactions: a systematic review.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze FAERS data to identify cases of drug-induced photosensitivity (DIP), examine demographic patterns, determine the drug classes involved, and highlight emerging trends in these reactions. Additionally, we explore potential signal drugs by mining the relevant reported data, aiming to provide insights for safer clinical use of medications. We reviewed the publicly available FAERS database from 2004 to 2023. Using DIP-related search terms such as "photosensitivity reaction," "polymorphic light eruption," or et al., we identified reports of DIP. The frequency and trends of these reports were then analyzed. Between 2004 and 2023, the FDA received 17,384,824 reports of adverse reactions, with 20,236 of these linked to DIP. After excluding cases with incomplete data on age, gender, or country of origin, the median patient age was 52 years (IQR = 66). Females comprised 55.71% of the cases (11,274), and 66.96% (12,459) of the reports originated from the United States. The top 45 drugs were responsible for 9,810 cases (48.48%). The three drug classes most commonly associated with DIP in the FAERS database were immunosuppressants, monoclonal antibodies, and antineoplastic agents. A disproportionality analysis of the top drugs revealed several newly identified drugs with signals for photosensitivity, including adalimumab, adapalene, secukinumab, and fingolimod. By analyzing publicly available FAERS data, we identified key themes and trends in DIP reactions. Immunosuppressants and monoclonal antibodies show mild trends in DIP occurrence. Additionally, adalimumab, adapalene, secukinumab, and fingolimod are novel drug signals of DIP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.