ArticleScientific reports2025
Mobile applications for skin cancer detection are vulnerable to physical camera-based adversarial attacks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- DermaCalibra: A Robust and Explainable Multimodal Framework for Skin Lesion Diagnosis via Bayesian Uncertainty and Dynamic Modulation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Skin cancer is one of the most prevalent malignant tumors, and early detection is crucial for patient prognosis, leading to the development of mobile applications as screening tools. Recent advances in deep neural networks (DNNs) have accelerated the deployment of DNN-based applications for automated skin cancer detection. While DNNs have demonstrated remarkable capabilities, they are known to be vulnerable to adversarial attacks, where carefully crafted perturbations can manipulate model predictions. The vulnerability of deployed medical mobile applications to such attacks remains largely unexplored under real-world conditions. Here, we investigate the susceptibility of three DNN-based medical mobile applications to physical adversarial attacks using transparent camera stickers under black-box conditions where internal model architectures are inaccessible. Through digital experiments with various DNN architectures trained on a publicly available skin lesion dataset, we first demonstrate that camera-based adversarial patterns can achieve high transferability across different models. Using these findings, we implement physical attacks by attaching optimized transparent stickers to mobile device cameras. Our results show that these attacks successfully manipulate application predictions, particularly for melanoma images, with attack success rates reaching 50-80% across all applications while maintaining visual imperceptibility. Notably, melanoma images showed consistently higher vulnerability compared to nevus images across all tested applications. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of real-world adversarial vulnerabilities in deployed medical mobile applications, revealing significant security concerns where prediction manipulation could affect diagnostic processes. Our study demonstrates the importance of security evaluation in deploying such applications in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.