Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40413255›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Mobile applications for skin cancer detection are vulnerable to physical camera-based adversarial attacks.

Junsei Oda, Kazuhiro Takemoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Junsei OdaDepartment of Bioscience and Bioinformatics, Kyushu Institute of Technology, Iizuka, Fukuoka, Japan.
Kazuhiro TakemotoDepartment of Bioscience and Bioinformatics, Kyushu Institute of Technology, Iizuka, Fukuoka, Japan. takemoto@bio.kyutech.ac.jp.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 21H03545
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin cancer is one of the most prevalent malignant tumors, and early detection is crucial for patient prognosis, leading to the development of mobile applications as screening tools. Recent advances in deep neural networks (DNNs) have accelerated the deployment of DNN-based applications for automated skin cancer detection. While DNNs have demonstrated remarkable capabilities, they are known to be vulnerable to adversarial attacks, where carefully crafted perturbations can manipulate model predictions. The vulnerability of deployed medical mobile applications to such attacks remains largely unexplored under real-world conditions. Here, we investigate the susceptibility of three DNN-based medical mobile applications to physical adversarial attacks using transparent camera stickers under black-box conditions where internal model architectures are inaccessible. Through digital experiments with various DNN architectures trained on a publicly available skin lesion dataset, we first demonstrate that camera-based adversarial patterns can achieve high transferability across different models. Using these findings, we implement physical attacks by attaching optimized transparent stickers to mobile device cameras. Our results show that these attacks successfully manipulate application predictions, particularly for melanoma images, with attack success rates reaching 50-80% across all applications while maintaining visual imperceptibility. Notably, melanoma images showed consistently higher vulnerability compared to nevus images across all tested applications. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of real-world adversarial vulnerabilities in deployed medical mobile applications, revealing significant security concerns where prediction manipulation could affect diagnostic processes. Our study demonstrates the importance of security evaluation in deploying such applications in clinical settings.

Indexed as

Computer SecurityMelanomaMobile ApplicationsSkin NeoplasmsHumansNeural Networks, ComputerPhotographyAdversarial attacksDeep neural networksMedical imagingSecurity and privacy

Identifiers

PMID40413255
PMCPMC12103594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.