ArticleScientific reports2025
Efficacy of olanzapine as an antiemetic drug for transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although the addition of olanzapine to conventional antiemetic therapy has been reported to be useful for systemic chemotherapy with highly emetogenic agents such as cisplatin, no studies have evaluated its efficacy in transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We evaluated the antiemetic efficacy of olanzapine in patients with HCC undergoing cisplatin-based TACE. This prospective study included 68 patients with HCC scheduled for cisplatin-based TACE between 2021 and 2022. Patients were divided into two groups: an olanzapine group receiving olanzapine 5 mg plus the conventional triple antiemetic combination and a control group receiving only the conventional triple combination therapy. The incidence of digestive symptoms and adverse events (AEs) in both groups were compared. For TACE-induced nausea and vomiting, the olanzapine group had similar antiemetic complete response (aCR) and complete control (CC) rates at 12 h post-TACE as the control group but significantly higher aCR and CC rates during the delayed-phase after 24 h and better patient satisfaction scores. No significant differences were noted in the occurrence of severe AEs in the two groups. The use of olanzapine, in addition to conventional antiemetics, may be a new standard for patients undergoing cisplatin-based TACE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.