Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40413211›Full record

ArticleScientific data2025

A Comprehensive Video Dataset for Surgical Laparoscopic Action Analysis.

Zi Ye, Ru Zhou, Zili Deng, Dan Wang, Ying Zhu, Xiaoli Jin, Lijun Zhang, Tianxiang Chen, Hanwei Zhang, Mingliang Wang

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zi Ye *Department of General Surgery, RuiJin Hospital LuWan Branch, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200020, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1002-0315
Ru Zhou *Department of General Surgery, RuiJin Hospital LuWan Branch, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200020, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9067-8920
Zili DengHangzhou Institute for Advanced Study, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang, 310024, China.
Dan WangHangzhou Institute for Advanced Study, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang, 310024, China.
Ying ZhuHangzhou Institute for Advanced Study, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang, 310024, China.
Xiaoli JinDepartment of General Surgery, RuiJin Hospital LuWan Branch, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200020, China.
Lijun ZhangInstitute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China.
Tianxiang ChenSchool of Cyber Space and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, Anhui, 230026, China.
Hanwei ZhangInstitute of Intelligent Software, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 511400, China. zhanghanwei0912@gmail.com.
Mingliang WangDepartment of General Surgery, RuiJin Hospital LuWan Branch, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200020, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laparoscopic surgery has been widely used in various surgical fields due to its minimally invasive and rapid recovery benefits. However, it demands a high level of technical expertise from surgeons. While advancements in computer vision and deep learning have significantly contributed to surgical action recognition, the effectiveness of these technologies is hindered by the limitations of existing publicly available datasets, such as their small scale, high homogeneity, and inconsistent labeling quality. To address the above issues, we developed the SLAM dataset (Surgical LAparoscopic Motions), which encompasses various surgical types such as laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendectomy. The dataset includes annotations for seven key actions: Abdominal Entry, Use Clip, Hook Cut, Suturing, Panoramic View, Local Panoramic View, and Suction. In total, it includes 4,097 video clips, each labeled with corresponding action categories. In addition, we comprehensively validated the dataset using the ViViT model, and the experimental results showed that the dataset exhibited superior training and testing capabilities in laparoscopic surgical action recognition, with the highest classification accuracy of 85.90%. As a publicly available benchmark resource, the SLAM dataset aims to promote the development of laparoscopic surgical action recognition and artificial intelligence-driven surgery, supporting intelligent surgical robots and surgical automation.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyVideo RecordingAppendectomyCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicHumans

Identifiers

PMID40413211
PMCPMC12103523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.