ArticleScientific data2025
A Comprehensive Video Dataset for Surgical Laparoscopic Action Analysis.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- End to end AI system for surgical gesture sequence recognition and clinical outcome prediction.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Cataract-LMM Large-Scale Multi-Source Multi-Task Benchmark for Deep Learning in Surgical Video Analysis.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Weakly supervised pre-training for surgical step recognition using unannotated and heterogeneously labeled videos.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- Surgical video-based temporal action analysis algorithm and competency assessment in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: development and exploratory evaluation.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Digital Tools Across the Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgical Pathway: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- TEMSET-24K: Densely Annotated Dataset for Indexing Multipart Endoscopic Videos using Surgical Timeline Segmentation.Scientific data · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Laparoscopic surgery has been widely used in various surgical fields due to its minimally invasive and rapid recovery benefits. However, it demands a high level of technical expertise from surgeons. While advancements in computer vision and deep learning have significantly contributed to surgical action recognition, the effectiveness of these technologies is hindered by the limitations of existing publicly available datasets, such as their small scale, high homogeneity, and inconsistent labeling quality. To address the above issues, we developed the SLAM dataset (Surgical LAparoscopic Motions), which encompasses various surgical types such as laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendectomy. The dataset includes annotations for seven key actions: Abdominal Entry, Use Clip, Hook Cut, Suturing, Panoramic View, Local Panoramic View, and Suction. In total, it includes 4,097 video clips, each labeled with corresponding action categories. In addition, we comprehensively validated the dataset using the ViViT model, and the experimental results showed that the dataset exhibited superior training and testing capabilities in laparoscopic surgical action recognition, with the highest classification accuracy of 85.90%. As a publicly available benchmark resource, the SLAM dataset aims to promote the development of laparoscopic surgical action recognition and artificial intelligence-driven surgery, supporting intelligent surgical robots and surgical automation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.