ArticleScientific reports2025
The order of multisensory associative sequences is reinstated as context feature during successful recognition.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ability of the human brain to encode and recognize sequential information from different sensory modalities is key to memory formation. The sequence in which these modalities are presented during encoding critically affects recognition. This study investigates the encoding of sensory modality sequences and its neural impact on recognition using multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) of oscillatory EEG activity. We examined the reinstatement of multisensory episode-specific sequences in n = 32 participants who encoded sound-image associations (e.g., the image of a ship with the sound of a frog). Images and sounds were natural scenes and 2-second real-life sounds, presented sequentially during encoding. During recognition, stimulus pairs were presented simultaneously, and classification was used to test whether the modality sequence order could be decoded as a contextual feature in memory. Oscillatory results identified a distinct neural signature during successful retrieval, associated with the original modality sequence. Furthermore, MVPA successfully decoded neural patterns of different modality sequences, hinting at specific memory traces. These findings suggest that the sequence in which sensory modalities are encoded forms a neural signature, affecting later recognition. This study provides novel insights into the relationship between modality encoding and recognition, with broad implications for cognitive neuroscience and memory research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.