Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40413162›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Medical Association2025

The association of patient and clinician demographics and concordance with medicaid sterilization consent form validity.

Lisa Jackson-Moore, Kim Malloy, Gene Urrutia, Kristen A Berg, Emily S Miller, Margaret Boozer, Tania Serna, Jennifer L Bailit, Suzanna Larkin, Kavita Shah Arora

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Medical Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lisa Jackson-MooreDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Kim MalloyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Gene UrrutiaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Kristen A BergCenter for Health Care Research & Policy, Population Health Research Institute, MetroHealth Medical System, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Emily S MillerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI 02903, USA.
Margaret BoozerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA.
Tania SernaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Jennifer L BailitCase Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Suzanna LarkinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Kavita Shah AroraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. Electronic address: kavita_arora@med.unc.edu.

Funding

Multi-level factors affecting postpartum sterilizationR01HD098127 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ARORA, KAVITA SHAH · 2020 to 2023
$2.5M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD098127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

OBJECTIVE(S): To evaluate the association between patient demographics, clinician demographics, and concordance of patient-clinician demographics and Medicaid sterilization consent form validity, defined as the waiting period having elapsed. STUDY

designSecondary analysis of a large, multi-center retrospective cohort study. This analysis included patients with Medicaid insurance desiring postpartum permanent contraception across three study sites. Our primary outcome was Medicaid sterilization consent form validity. Patient demographics were abstracted from the electronic medical record. Clinician demographics were obtained both through self- and peer-report. Descriptive, random effects modeling, and multivariable logistic regression analyses were utilized.

resultsOf the 1644 patients delivered by 124 clinicians in our cohort, 840 (51 %) had a valid Medicaid sterilization consent form. Descriptively, patients who were Black, unmarried, and not college educated were more likely to have valid forms (p < 0.001). The religious affiliation of the clinician (p < 0.001), but no other clinician characteristics, was associated with form validity. In multivariable models, patients who were of a different racial identity than their clinicians were more likely to have a valid form (aOR 1.32, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.05-1.66). CONCLUSION(S): While unable to determine the causes of our findings, the differential proportion of Medicaid sterilization consent form validity based on patient characteristics is concerning. Differences in form validity based on patient-clinician racial and ethnic concordance is deserving of further study.

Indexed as

Consent FormsMedicaidSterilization, ReproductiveAdultFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesYoung AdultDisparityDiversityInformed consentPostpartum contraceptionSterilizationWaiting period

Identifiers

PMID40413162
PMCPMC12167677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.