ReviewBlood reviews2025
Patient-reported outcomes - the missing link to advancing light chain (AL) amyloidosis clinical research.
Review in Blood reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Current Role of Physiotherapy in Systemic Light-Chain (AL) Amyloidosis and Multiple Myeloma.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Systemic light chain (AL) amyloidosis often results in multi-organ dysfunction and significant morbidity. Clinical assessments may not capture the full impact of disease and treatment on patients. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) can help fill this gap. Although evidence suggests that the use of PROs provides additional predictive value beyond established cardiac staging systems, their integration into standard AL amyloidosis management remains limited. Our review examines the prognostic and therapeutic value of PROs and their current use as endpoints in clinical trials. We also discuss practical considerations, including instrument selection and administration, data interpretation, and reporting. Finally, we present a roadmap for integrating PROs into routine AL amyloidosis management, focusing on the selection of appropriate ePRO platforms and implementation strategies. We advocate a framework for data sharing and a coordinated research agenda. By addressing evidence gaps and prioritizing the patient perspective, PROs have the potential to advance AL amyloidosis care and research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.