Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40413080›Full record

ReviewBlood reviews2025

Patient-reported outcomes - the missing link to advancing light chain (AL) amyloidosis clinical research.

Tobias Dittrich, Lina Weinert, Anita D'Souza

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Blood reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tobias DittrichDepartment of Internal Medicine V, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany; Institute of Medical Informatics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Lina WeinertHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Section for Oral Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Anita D'SouzaDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA. Electronic address: anitadsouza@mcw.edu.

Funding

Early diagnosis of light chain amyloidosisR01HL166339 · NHLBI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI Anita D'Souza · 2023 to 2026
$1.1M
Development and validation of a disease-relevant patient-reported outcome tool in light chain amyloidosisK23HL141445 · NHLBI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI D'SOUZA, ANITA · 2019 to 2022
$597k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL141445NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL166339
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systemic light chain (AL) amyloidosis often results in multi-organ dysfunction and significant morbidity. Clinical assessments may not capture the full impact of disease and treatment on patients. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) can help fill this gap. Although evidence suggests that the use of PROs provides additional predictive value beyond established cardiac staging systems, their integration into standard AL amyloidosis management remains limited. Our review examines the prognostic and therapeutic value of PROs and their current use as endpoints in clinical trials. We also discuss practical considerations, including instrument selection and administration, data interpretation, and reporting. Finally, we present a roadmap for integrating PROs into routine AL amyloidosis management, focusing on the selection of appropriate ePRO platforms and implementation strategies. We advocate a framework for data sharing and a coordinated research agenda. By addressing evidence gaps and prioritizing the patient perspective, PROs have the potential to advance AL amyloidosis care and research.

Indexed as

Immunoglobulin Light-chain AmyloidosisPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresBiomedical ResearchDisease ManagementHumansPrognosisAL amyloidosisHRQOLPRO

Identifiers

PMID40413080
PMCPMC12354096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.