ArticleBMJ open2025
Cost of physiotherapy non-attendance at a metropolitan hospital in Australia: A time-driven activity-based costing study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectives(1) Identify the processes, staff time and labour costs associated with non-attendance at two physiotherapy outpatient clinics using time-driven activity-based costing; (2) estimate labour cost-burden of non-attendance response scenarios.
designA six-step time-driven activity-based costing method was used, including scenario analyses.
settingTwo tertiary hospital outpatient clinics.
participantsClinic non-attendance rates were determined from digital administrative records for participating clinics. Interviews and iterative discussions were conducted with 15 administrative and clinical staff to establish process maps and key parameters. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was health service labour cost associated with clinic non-attendance. Four key work processes were identified and costed (2023, A$).
resultsClinic non-attendance rates for the 2018-2021 period were 8% (Clinic 1) and 10% (Clinic 2). Complex triaging cases constituted greater costs than simple triaging cases. Projected annual costs of non-attendance were as high as A$114 827 for a single clinic. The most expensive referral and response scenario was internal referral with non-attendance that was converted to a telephone appointment (mean cost of A$113/appointment).
conclusionNon-attendance rates at participating clinics were at the lower end of values reported in prior literature; however, substantial healthcare resource waste was still evident. Findings highlighted the extent to which non-attendance at scheduled clinic appointments may not only impact patients' welfare through lost treatment opportunity, but also carry substantial opportunity cost from wasted hospital resources that could have been allocated to other referred patients. Establishing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interventions to reduce non-attendance remains a priority.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.