ArticleBMJ open2025
Implications derived from the strengths and weaknesses observed in Iran's primary healthcare programmes during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 outbreak at the end of 2019 severely impacted global healthcare systems, especially primary healthcare services. This paper aimed to identify the implications derived from the strengths and weaknesses observed in Iran's primary healthcare (PHC) programmes during the pandemic.
methodsThis was a qualitative study conducted in 2021. 13 semistructured interviews were held with Iranian healthcare policymakers and executive managers, selected via snowball sampling, using the World Health Organization's analytical framework. Finally, a thematic analysis was conducted on the interview data.
resultsThe thematic analysis of the findings yielded five major themes: revision of healthcare financing, redefining education and research in primary healthcare, redefinition of primary healthcare, development of a new model for family medicine, and community engagement.
conclusionAddressing vertical inequality in Iran's healthcare system was delineated to be crucial. Meanwhile, multiple strategies including enhancing family physicians' knowledge and skills, decentralising decision-making, empowering them and involving communities in healthcare planning were presented to improve PHC and family medicine. Further empirical research is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.